2024
Diandric triploid partial mole versus digynic nonmolar triploidy: is morphological assessment sufficient for the diagnostic distinction?
Nagy A, Niu N, Sun T, Buza N, Hui P. Diandric triploid partial mole versus digynic nonmolar triploidy: is morphological assessment sufficient for the diagnostic distinction? Histopathology 2024, 85: 879-888. PMID: 39031756, DOI: 10.1111/his.15247.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive predictive valueTriploid gestationsPartial moleTrophoblastic hyperplasiaVillous sizeCistern formationHistological parametersPostmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaTriploid partial molesGenotype-phenotype correlation studiesGestational trophoblastic neoplasiaPartial hydatidiform moleModerate interobserver agreementVillous populationsTrophoblastic neoplasiaGestational weeksHydatidiform moleClinical presentationPatient ageDigynic triploidyAbnormal histologyInterobserver agreementGestationSyncytiotrophoblastHistological assessment
2013
Partial Hydatidiform Mole
Buza N, Hui P. Partial Hydatidiform Mole. International Journal Of Gynecological Pathology 2013, 32: 307-315. PMID: 23518914, DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e3182626011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVillous sizeVillous hydropsMorphologic featuresHigh positive predictive valueCases of PHMSignificant histologic overlapPositive predictive valuePopulations of villusPartial Hydatidiform MoleCistern formationRoutine workupGynecologic pathologistsVillus sizeDefinitive diagnosisHistologic diagnosisHistologic findingsAvailable hematoxylinHistologic overlapDNA genotypingHistologic parametersEosin slidesPredictive valueDiagnostic significanceChromosomal trisomiesTrophoblastic hyperplasia