2022
PRESTO 2: An International Survey to Evaluate Patients’ Injection Experiences with the Latest Devices/Formulations of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapies for Neuroendocrine Tumors or Acromegaly
O’Toole D, Kunz P, Webb S, Goldstein G, Khawaja S, McDonnell M, Boiziau S, Gueguen D, Houchard A, Ribeiro-Oliveira A, Prebtani A. PRESTO 2: An International Survey to Evaluate Patients’ Injection Experiences with the Latest Devices/Formulations of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapies for Neuroendocrine Tumors or Acromegaly. Advances In Therapy 2022, 40: 671-690. PMID: 36502449, PMCID: PMC9741754, DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02360-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInjection site painNeuroendocrine tumorsInjection experienceRecent injectionLanreotide autogel/depotMultivariate logistic regression modelOdds of painSomatostatin analogue therapyProportion of patientsInjection site reactionsLogistic regression modelsSSA useAnalogue therapySecondary endpointsDisease subgroupsPainPatientsAcromegalyInjection modalitiesMonthsInjectionTumorsPMON57 Impact of Injection Modalities on Real-World Injection Experience in Patients with Acromegaly or Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) Treated With Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy: Data from the PRESTO 2 Survey
Ribeiro-Oliveira A, O’toole D, Kunz P, Houchard A, Boiziau S, Prebtani A, Webb S. PMON57 Impact of Injection Modalities on Real-World Injection Experience in Patients with Acromegaly or Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) Treated With Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy: Data from the PRESTO 2 Survey. Journal Of The Endocrine Society 2022, 6: a557-a557. PMCID: PMC9625390, DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1157.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInjection site painNeuroendocrine tumorsInjection experiencePrimary endpointLast doseLast injectionLanreotide autogel/depotFirst-line medical treatmentInjection modalitiesMultivariate logistic regression analysisOdds of painProportion of patientsSomatostatin analogue therapyInjection site reactionsLogistic regression analysisSecondary endpointsAnalogue therapySSA therapyDisease groupPainMedical treatmentPatientsAcromegalyInjection siteEndpointRandomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211)
Kunz PL, Graham NT, Catalano PJ, Nimeiri HS, Fisher GA, Longacre TA, Suarez CJ, Martin BA, Yao JC, Kulke MH, Hendifar AE, Shanks JC, Shah MH, Zalupski MM, Schmulbach EL, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Strosberg JR, O'Dwyer PJ, O'Dwyer P, Benson A. Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2022, 41: 1359-1369. PMID: 36260828, PMCID: PMC9995105, DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsProgression-free survivalPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsMedian progression-free survivalPrimary end pointNeuroendocrine tumorsResponse rateObjective responseOverall survivalRandomized studyIntermediate-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsLonger progression-free survivalEnd pointMGMT deficiencyMedian overall survivalPrimary analysis populationKey eligibility criteriaPhase II trialSmall prospective studiesHigh response rateMethylguanine methyltransferaseCapecitabine/Eligible patientsSecondary endpointsII trialA randomized study of temozolomide or temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Final analysis of efficacy and evaluation of MGMT (ECOG-ACRIN E2211).
Kunz P, Graham N, Catalano P, Nimeiri H, Fisher G, Longacre T, Suarez C, Rubin D, Yao J, Kulke M, Hendifar A, Shanks J, Shah M, Zalupski M, Schmulbach E, Reidy D, Strosberg J, Wong T, O'Dwyer P, Benson A. A randomized study of temozolomide or temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Final analysis of efficacy and evaluation of MGMT (ECOG-ACRIN E2211). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2022, 40: 4004-4004. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsMedian progression-free survivalAdvanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsCombination of capecitabineNeuroendocrine tumorsResponse rateEligible patientsPrimary endpointOverall survivalIntermediate-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsTwo-sided log-rank testLonger progression-free survivalEfficacy analysis populationObjective tumor responsePhase II trialLog-rank testHigh response rateSecondary endpointsII trialProspective studyAnalysis populationTreatment optionsTumor responseInterim analysis
2021
177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high‑dose long-acting octreotide in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-1): final overall survival and long-term safety results from an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
Strosberg JR, Caplin ME, Kunz PL, Ruszniewski PB, Bodei L, Hendifar A, Mittra E, Wolin EM, Yao JC, Pavel ME, Grande E, Van Cutsem E, Seregni E, Duarte H, Gericke G, Bartalotta A, Mariani MF, Demange A, Mutevelic S, Krenning EP, investigators N. 177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high‑dose long-acting octreotide in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-1): final overall survival and long-term safety results from an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2021, 22: 1752-1763. PMID: 34793718, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00572-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMedian overall survivalMidgut neuroendocrine tumorsTreatment-related serious adverse eventsLong-term safety resultsFinal overall survivalPrespecified final analysisPhase 3 trialProgression-free survivalSerious adverse eventsOverall survivalLu-DOTATATE treatmentAdverse eventsNeuroendocrine tumorsLu-DOTATATESecondary endpointsLast patientMyelodysplastic syndromeSafety resultsInteractive web-based response systemControl groupAdvanced midgut neuroendocrine tumorsFinal overall survival analysisWeb-based response systemFinal analysisNETTER-1 trialFinal overall survival in the phase 3 NETTER-1 study of lutetium-177-DOTATATE in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors.
Strosberg J, Caplin M, Kunz P, Ruszniewski P, Bodei L, Hendifar A, Mittra E, Wolin E, Yao J, Pavel M, Grande E, Van Cutsem E, Seregni E, Duarte H, Gericke G, Bartalotta A, Demange A, Mutevelic S, Krenning E, group O. Final overall survival in the phase 3 NETTER-1 study of lutetium-177-DOTATATE in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 4112-4112. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4112.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalMedian overall survivalFinal overall survivalNETTER-1 studyNETTER-1 trialNew safety signalsOverall survivalMidgut neuroendocrine tumorsControl armMyelodysplastic syndromeNeuroendocrine tumorsLu-DOTATATEPrimary endpointLast patientSafety signalsFurther anti-cancer treatmentBest supportive careKey secondary endpointOpen-label trialLutetium-177 DOTATATEAnti-cancer treatmentEligible patientsNETTER-1RECIST 1.1Secondary endpoints
2020
Evaluation of the incidence of acute nausea and vomiting after administration of an amino acid solution containing only arginine and lysine with lutetium Lu-177 dotatate.
Alonzo N, Seyer M, Kim E, Keshavarzi R, Yee K, Kunz P. Evaluation of the incidence of acute nausea and vomiting after administration of an amino acid solution containing only arginine and lysine with lutetium Lu-177 dotatate. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 12113-12113. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.12113.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLu-177 DOTATATEAA infusionAmino acid solutionRates of nauseaPercentage of patientsRetrospective chart reviewGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsAcute nauseaSecondary endpointsAdult patientsChart reviewNeuroendocrine tumorsNormal salinePatientsInfusion timeAA solutionIncidenceDOTATATEInfusionHistorical incidenceAmino acids 10NauseaVomitingAdministrationEssential AA
2015
Phase II pilot study of single-agent etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in bevacizumab-resistant high grade glioma
Nagpal S, Recht CK, Bertrand S, Thomas RP, Ajlan A, Pena J, Gershon M, Coffey G, Kunz PL, Li G, Recht LD. Phase II pilot study of single-agent etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in bevacizumab-resistant high grade glioma. Journal Of Neuro-Oncology 2015, 123: 277-282. PMID: 25935109, PMCID: PMC4452613, DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1795-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsPolyethylene GlycolsPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival RateYoung AdultConceptsHigh-grade gliomasEtirinotecan pegolOverall survivalRANO criteriaPhase II pilot studyGrade 3 toxicityMedian overall survivalOpen-label trialFurther clinical investigationMedian KPSChemotherapy cyclesHematologic toxicityPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsPartial responseMedian agePatient agePoor prognosisHGG patientsTumor exposureClinical dataAnaplastic astrocytomaBevacizumabClinical investigationGrade gliomas
2014
A phase II study of capecitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for metastatic or unresectable gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kunz P, Nandoskar P, Koontz M, Ji H, Ford J, Balise R, Kamaya A, Rubin D, Fisher G. A phase II study of capecitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for metastatic or unresectable gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32: 115-115. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.115.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalGastroesophageal junctionStable diseaseOverall survivalPartial responseGastric adenocarcinomaPrimary endpointProgressive diseaseDay 1Response rateMedian progression-free survivalCombination of capecitabineFirst tumor assessmentBest supportive careMedian overall survivalPhase II studyPromising response ratesAddition of bevacizumabIncidence of adenocarcinomaMajor health problemQuality of lifeSecondary endpointsBaseline characteristicsFree survivalGastric cardia