2019
Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay
Oken K, Schoenfeld MH, Kusumoto F. Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. JAMA Cardiology 2019, 4: 823-824. PMID: 31042273, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1231.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEvaluation and Treatment of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay
Oken K, Schoenfeld MH, Kusumoto F. Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. JAMA Cardiology 2019, 4: 708-709. PMID: 31017630, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1069.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary. Circulation 2018, 140: e333-e381. PMID: 30586771, DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000627.Peer-Reviewed Original Research2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. Circulation 2018, 140: e382-e482. PMID: 30586772, DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000628.Peer-Reviewed Original Research2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2018, 74: e51-e156. PMID: 30412709, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044.Peer-Reviewed Original Research2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2018, 74: 932-987. PMID: 30412710, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiology/American Heart Association Task ForceACC/AHA/HRS guidelinesAmerican Heart Association Task ForceCardiac conduction delayManagement of patientsClinical practice guidelinesHeart Rhythm SocietyHRS guidelinesPractice guidelinesConduction delayAmerican CollegeA ReportTask ForceGuidelinesBradycardiaPatients2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: Executive summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society
Members W, Kusumoto F, Schoenfeld M, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen K, Gold M, Goldschlager N, Hamilton R, Joglar J, Kim R, Lee R, Marine J, McLeod C, Oken K, Patton K, Pellegrini C, Selzman K, Thompson A, Varosy P. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: Executive summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 2018, 16: e227-e279. PMID: 30412777, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.036.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmerican Heart AssociationBradycardiaCardiac Conduction System DiseaseCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular AgentsElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacHeart RateHumansPatient Care ManagementPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeUnited StatesConceptsCardiology/American Heart Association Task ForceACC/AHA/HRS guidelinesAmerican Heart Association Task ForceCardiac conduction delayManagement of patientsClinical practice guidelinesHeart Rhythm SocietyHRS guidelinesPractice guidelinesConduction delayAmerican CollegeA ReportTask ForceGuidelinesBradycardiaPatients2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society
Members W, Kusumoto F, Schoenfeld M, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen K, Gold M, Goldschlager N, Hamilton R, Joglar J, Kim R, Lee R, Marine J, McLeod C, Oken K, Patton K, Pellegrini C, Selzman K, Thompson A, Varosy P. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 2018, 16: e128-e226. PMID: 30412778, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.037.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Follow‐Up of the Patient with a CIED
Doppalapudi H, Blitzer M, Schoenfeld M. Follow‐Up of the Patient with a CIED. 2014, 453-503. DOI: 10.1002/9781118459553.ch11.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Psychosocial and Cardiac Outcomes of Yoga for ICD Patients: A Randomized Clinical Control Trial
TOISE SC, SEARS SF, SCHOENFELD MH, BLITZER ML, MARIEB MA, DRURY JH, SLADE MD, DONOHUE TJ. Psychosocial and Cardiac Outcomes of Yoga for ICD Patients: A Randomized Clinical Control Trial. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 2013, 37: 48-62. PMID: 23981048, PMCID: PMC4524735, DOI: 10.1111/pace.12252.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYoga groupControl groupCardiac outcomesICD recipientsShock anxietyImplantable cardioverter defibrillator patientsClinical control trialsCardioverter-defibrillator patientsClinical symptomsICD patientsDefibrillator patientsControl trialLower riskVentricular eventsPsychosocial dataComplementary medicineHome practiceStandardized protocolPsychosocial risksPsychosocial benefitsWeekly classesSignificant differencesPatientsYogaRecipients
2012
The pathway to physician reimbursement for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a history and brief synopsis
Roka A, Schoenfeld M. The pathway to physician reimbursement for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a history and brief synopsis. Journal Of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2012, 36: 137-144. PMID: 23242735, DOI: 10.1007/s10840-012-9747-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiac implantable electronic devicesImplantable electronic devicesSinus node dysfunctionImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorEligible patient populationHeart failureTherapeutic modalitiesCardioverter-defibrillatorClinical trialsPatient populationPrimary preventionHeightened scrutinyProfessional societiesRegistry participantsLegislative agenciesRegulatory oversightAdministrative burdenPatientsFrequent targetHealthcare systemRegulatory agenciesImprove accessPhysician reimbursementGovernmental agenciesDecrease abuseNatural history of the Sprint Fidelis lead: survival analysis from a large single-center study
Tzogias L, Bellavia D, Sharma S, Donohue TJ, Schoenfeld MH. Natural history of the Sprint Fidelis lead: survival analysis from a large single-center study. Journal Of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2012, 34: 37-44. PMID: 22314669, DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9647-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLead Integrity AlertFidelis leadInappropriate shocksLead failureIndependent predictorsDouble-peaked patternLarge single-center studyLarge single-center cohortNatural historyLead survival ratesSingle-center cohortSingle-center experienceSingle-center studyLead failure rateSprint Fidelis leadFidelis lead failureMethodsAll patientsLead survivalResultsA totalSurvival analysisSurvival rateMultivariate analysisPatientsConclusionsThis studyPrior reports
2010
HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy This document was developed in collaboration and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM); the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA)
Lampert R, Hayes DL, Annas GJ, Farley MA, Goldstein NE, Hamilton RM, Kay GN, Kramer DB, Mueller PS, Padeletti L, Pozuelo L, Schoenfeld MH, Vardas PE, Wiegand DL, Zellner R. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy This document was developed in collaboration and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM); the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA). Heart Rhythm 2010, 7: 1008-1026. PMID: 20471915, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.04.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEuropean Heart Rhythm AssociationAmerican Heart AssociationCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesAmerican Geriatrics SocietyPalliative Nurses AssociationWithdrawal of therapyExpert consensus statementImplantable electronic devicesEnd of lifeHeart AssociationConsensus statementPalliative medicineAmerican CollegeGeriatrics SocietyAmerican AcademyNurses AssociationHospiceAssociationPatientsTherapyCardiology
2005
Follow‐Up Assessments of the Pacemaker Patient
Schoenfeld M, Blitzer M. Follow‐Up Assessments of the Pacemaker Patient. 2005, 500-543. DOI: 10.1002/9780470750674.ch11.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1999
Optic Neuropathy Following Amiodarone Therapy
SREIH A, SCHOENFELD M, MARIEB M. Optic Neuropathy Following Amiodarone Therapy. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 1999, 22: 1108-1110. PMID: 10456646, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00582.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOptic neuropathyAmiodarone therapyComplete ophthalmologic examinationDoses of amiodaroneYears of ageBilateral involvementRandomized studyOphthalmologic examinationUnilateral involvementOcular changesTrue incidenceElectrophysiology practiceSuch therapyFirst symptomsPatientsOcular fundusNeuropathyTherapyPoor healthAmiodaroneCareful evaluationTreatmentInvolvementMedicationsComplications
1998
Inappropriate Shocks Delivered by an ICD as a Result of Sensed Potentials from a Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation Unit
PHILBIN D, MARIEB M, AITHAL K, SCHOENFELD M. Inappropriate Shocks Delivered by an ICD as a Result of Sensed Potentials from a Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation Unit. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 1998, 21: 2010-2011. PMID: 9793104, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00027.x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research