2016
Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
Raghu M, Durand MA, Andrejeva L, Goehler A, Michalski MH, Geisel JL, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Butler R, Forman HP, Philpotts LE. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time. Radiology 2016, 281: 54-61. PMID: 27139264, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151999.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Early Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening Mammography
Durand MA, Haas BM, Yao X, Geisel JL, Raghu M, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Philpotts LE. Early Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening Mammography. Radiology 2014, 274: 85-92. PMID: 25188431, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131319.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHistoric controlsScreening mammogramsConventional mammographyCancer detection rateEarly clinical experienceHIPAA-compliant studyDigital breast tomosynthesisUse of tomosynthesisPatient ageRetrospective reviewScreening examinationRisk factorsMammographic findingsThree-dimensional groupsClinical experienceInstitutional reviewTwo-dimensional examinationBreast densityArchitectural distortionScreening mammographyCancerBreast tomosynthesisRate of recallMammographyPatientsDiagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, Niklason LT. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2014, 202: 273-81. PMID: 24450665, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11240.Peer-Reviewed Original Research