2023
Reflections on Cross-Modal Correspondences: Current Understanding and Issues for Future Research
Motoki K, Marks L, Velasco C. Reflections on Cross-Modal Correspondences: Current Understanding and Issues for Future Research. Multisensory Research 2023, 37: 1-23. PMID: 37963487, DOI: 10.1163/22134808-bja10114.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCross-modal correspondencesFuture researchBehavioral measuresSensory featuresSensory stimuliSensory dimensionsExplosion of researchExplanatory frameworkRelative associationComplementary perspectivesMost peopleNarrative reviewResearchStimuliSensesAssociationMultiple fieldsDimensionsDifferent kindsCorrespondencePeopleMeasuresViewPerspectiveResearchers
2021
Does color change the identification of color-flavor pairs?
Shavit A, Marks L. Does color change the identification of color-flavor pairs? Journal Of Vision 2021, 21: 2843. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.9.2843.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Interactions of Lemon, Sucrose and Citric Acid in Enhancing Citrus, Sweet and Sour Flavors
Veldhuizen MG, Siddique A, Rosenthal S, Marks LE. Interactions of Lemon, Sucrose and Citric Acid in Enhancing Citrus, Sweet and Sour Flavors. Chemical Senses 2017, 43: 17-26. PMID: 29293949, PMCID: PMC5863559, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx063.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSynesthesia: Then and now
Marks, L.E. (2017). Synesthesia: Then and now. In O. Deroy (Ed.), Sensory Blending: On Synaesthesia and Related Phenomena. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13-44.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast
Shepard TG, Shavit AY, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast. Perception 2016, 46: 268-282. PMID: 28024444, PMCID: PMC5944861, DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextExperiment 1Sense modalitiesSensory modalitiesIntensity judgmentsExperiment 4Experiment 2Contextual contrastSuccessive stimuliEvidence of contrastEvidence of assimilationContextual effectsTaste intensityTest sessionsResponse scaleJudgmentsStimuliLoudnessMagnitude estimationTaste perceptionVisual analogueConsistent evidenceTaste stimuliSynesthesia: Perception, Language, Digital Art
Marks L, Mulvenna C. Synesthesia: Perception, Language, Digital Art. 2016, 29-34. DOI: 10.1515/9783110459937-004.ChaptersThe semantic basis of taste-shape associations
Velasco C, Woods AT, Marks LE, Cheok AD, Spence C. The semantic basis of taste-shape associations. PeerJ 2016, 4: e1644. PMID: 26966646, PMCID: PMC4783761, DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1644.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFlavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context
Hallowell ES, Parikh R, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Flavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context. Chemical Senses 2016, 41: 249-259. PMID: 26830499, PMCID: PMC5006141, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv087.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextSensory eventsSignal detection theoryDifferent sessionsPerceptual spaceFlavor identificationIntensity ratingsOlfactory flavorantsContextual conditionsCitrus componentsDifferent contextsSweet intensityTask of identificationRatingsSessionsContextResponse criteriaStimuliJudgmentsTaskOral mixtureDecision rulesTheory
2015
Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence
Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence. Chemical Senses 2015, 40: 565-575. PMID: 26304508, PMCID: PMC4675834, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv042.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink
Eitan Z, Schupak A, Gotler A, Marks LE. Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink. Experimental Psychology 2014, 61: 273-284. PMID: 24351984, DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000246.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSynesthesia on Our Mind
Marks L, Mulvennad C. Synesthesia on Our Mind. Theoria Et Historia Scientiarum 2014, 10: 13-36. DOI: 10.12775/ths-2013-0002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSynesthesia: A teeming multiplicity
Marks, L.E. (2014). Synesthesia: A teeming multiplicity. In E. Cardeña, S.J. Lynn, & S.C. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence, Revised Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 79-108.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling
Brewer JM, Shavit AY, Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Parikh R, Marks LE. Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling. Chemical Senses 2013, 38: 305-313. PMID: 23329730, PMCID: PMC3629875, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs142.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSynesthesia, at and near its borders
Marks LE, Mulvenna CM. Synesthesia, at and near its borders. Frontiers In Psychology 2013, 4: 651. PMID: 24133467, PMCID: PMC3783847, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00651.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchWeak synesthesia in the general population
Marks, L.E. (2013). In J. Simner and E. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 761-789.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2012
Garner’s paradigm and audiovisual correspondence in dynamic stimuli: Pitch and vertical direction
Eitan Z, Marks L. Garner’s paradigm and audiovisual correspondence in dynamic stimuli: Pitch and vertical direction. Multisensory Research 2012, 25: 70-70. DOI: 10.1163/187847612x646910.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGarner interferenceCongruence effectGarner paradigmDynamic stimuliVisual motionPattern of resultsCrossmodal interactionsMultisensory stimuliIrrelevant stimuliAudiovisual correspondencesPerceptual correspondenceEcological validityUnchanging stimulusStatic stimuliDiscrimination paradigmExperiment 1Experiment 2Pitch changesTest stimuliTrial variationDimensional interactionStimuliPitch glideDifferent modalitiesStatic baselines
2011
Detecting Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Models of Probability Summation
Marks LE, Veldhuizen MG, Shepard TG, Shavit AY. Detecting Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Models of Probability Summation. Chemical Senses 2011, 37: 263-277. PMID: 22075720, PMCID: PMC3278677, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr103.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFlavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context
Marks LE, Shepard TG, Burger K, Chakwin EM. Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context. Physiology & Behavior 2011, 105: 443-450. PMID: 21930139, PMCID: PMC3225720, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.039.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Measurement of Loudness, Part I: Methods, Problems, and Pitfalls
Marks L, Florentine M. Measurement of Loudness, Part I: Methods, Problems, and Pitfalls. Springer Handbook Of Auditory Research 2010, 37: 17-56. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1_2.ChaptersMeasurement of Loudness, Part II: Context Effects
Arieh Y, Marks L. Measurement of Loudness, Part II: Context Effects. Springer Handbook Of Auditory Research 2010, 37: 57-87. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1_3.Chapters