2018
Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study
Zou CX, Becker JE, Phillips AT, Garritano JM, Krumholz HM, Miller JE, Ross JS. Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study. Trials 2018, 19: 581. PMID: 30352601, PMCID: PMC6199729, DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2957-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRetrospective cohort studyPublication biasNeuropsychiatric indicationsCohort studyClinical trialsRelative riskEfficacy trialsFDA approvalPositive trialsFisher's exact testRecent FDA approvalDrug Administration Amendments ActClinical trial publicationsTRIAL REGISTRATIONMAIN OUTCOMEProportion of trialsNeuropsychiatric drugsNew drug approvalsTrial publicationsExact testMedical interventionsTrialsDrug approvalNew drugsDrugsAdherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ (ICMJE) prospective registration policy and implications for outcome integrity: a cross-sectional analysis of trials published in high-impact specialty society journals
Gopal AD, Wallach JD, Aminawung JA, Gonsalves G, Dal-Ré R, Miller JE, Ross JS. Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ (ICMJE) prospective registration policy and implications for outcome integrity: a cross-sectional analysis of trials published in high-impact specialty society journals. Trials 2018, 19: 448. PMID: 30134950, PMCID: PMC6106722, DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2825-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary outcome dataOutcome dataCross-sectional analysisUnregistered trialsTrial characteristicsClinical trialsFavorable findingsProfessional medical societiesMedical societiesIndustry-funded trialsFrequency of registrationPrimary outcomeRegistered trialsEnrollment siteProspective fashionChi-square analysisProportion of trialsOriginal research reportsInitial ascertainmentTrialsHigh-impact journalsMedical Journal EditorsRegistration timingRetrospective registrationLower ratesDelays in the Publication of Important Clinical Trial Findings in Oncology
Qunaj L, Jain RH, Atoria CL, Gennarelli RL, Miller JE, Bach PB. Delays in the Publication of Important Clinical Trial Findings in Oncology. JAMA Oncology 2018, 4: e180264-e180264. PMID: 29710325, PMCID: PMC6145729, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0264.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting
Phillips AT, Desai NR, Krumholz HM, Zou CX, Miller JE, Ross JS. Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting. Trials 2017, 18: 333. PMID: 28720112, PMCID: PMC5516301, DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2068-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiovascular diseaseTRIAL REGISTRATIONFDA approvalNew drugsClinical trial registrationFDA Amendments ActDrug Administration Amendments ActAccessible trial registryClinical trial publicationsTrials RegistryResultsBetween 2005Efficacy trialsFDA reviewersTrial publicationsOutcome reportingMedical literatureReviewer interpretationsTrialsReporting of findingsDiseaseFDA documentsDrugsDiabetesFDAAAReviewers
2016
Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees
Li RH, Wacholtz MC, Barnes M, Boggs L, Callery-D'Amico S, Davis A, Digilova A, Forster D, Heffernan K, Luthin M, Lynch HF, McNair L, Miller JE, Murphy J, Van Campen L, Wilenzick M, Wolf D, Woolston C, Aldinger C, Bierer BE. Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees. Journal Of Medical Ethics 2016, 42: 229. PMID: 26811365, PMCID: PMC4819642, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102540.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsResearch ethics committee reviewResearch ethics issuesCritical ethical issuesEthics committee reviewEthical principlesEthics issuesEthics reviewEthics sectionEthical issuesClinical research protocolsEthics CommitteeProtocol writersCommittee reviewProtocol approvalResearch protocolReview processTool kitIssuesMultinational settingClinical Trial CenterDeliberationHarvardClinical trial protocolSpecific attentionWriters
2015
Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials
Whicher DM, Miller JE, Dunham KM, Joffe S. Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2015, 12: 442-448. PMID: 26374683, PMCID: PMC4592478, DOI: 10.1177/1740774515597699.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicDecision MakingHumansResearch DesignUnited States
2013
How a Clinical Trial Registry Became a Symbol of Misinformation
Miller JE. How a Clinical Trial Registry Became a Symbol of Misinformation. The Hastings Center Report 2013, 43: 11-12. PMID: 24249467, DOI: 10.1002/hast.226.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiasClinical Trials as TopicDrug IndustryHumansPoliticsRegistriesResearch DesignScientific MisconductSEER ProgramUnited StatesConceptsFirst national registryClinical Trials RegistryOngoing clinical trialsNational Cancer InstitutePublic health goalsNational Cancer ActTrials RegistryOpen trialNational registryClinical trialsCancer InstituteRegistryHealth goalsCancer ActCancer therapyPatientsTrialsPharmaceutical companiesDread diseaseDoctorsTherapyCancerDisease