2000
Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality
Lee V, Lavelle M, Rofsky N, Laub G, Thomasson D, Krinsky G, Weinreb J. Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality. Radiology 2000, 215: 365-72. PMID: 10796909, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma16365.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHepatic ArteryHepatic VeinsHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverLiver DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPortal VeinQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsRespirationVena Cava, InferiorConceptsContrast materialMagnetic resonance imaging examinationsPatient underwent repeatVascular anatomic variantsDynamic contrastPortal venous phaseArterial dominanceUnderwent repeatVenous anatomyAnatomic variantsImaging examinationsTest bolusTest doseVenous phaseArterial phaseRepeat studyHepatic MRGadopentetate dimeglumineGradient-echo imagingTechnical qualityEnhanced acquisitionMaximal enhancementBreath-hold imagesOriginal study
1999
Echo‐train STIR MRI of the liver: Comparison of breath‐hold and non‐breath‐hold imaging strategies
Earls J, Rofsky N, DeCorato D, Krinsky G, Weinreb J. Echo‐train STIR MRI of the liver: Comparison of breath‐hold and non‐breath‐hold imaging strategies. Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1999, 9: 87-92. PMID: 10030655, DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199901)9:1<87::aid-jmri12>3.0.co;2-5.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1997
Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector.
Earls J, Rofsky N, DeCorato D, Krinsky G, Weinreb J. Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector. Radiology 1997, 202: 268-73. PMID: 8988222, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988222.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1996
Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.
Rofsky N, Weinreb J, Ambrosino M, Safir J, Krinsky G. Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. Journal Of Computer Assisted Tomography 1996, 20: 230-5. PMID: 8606229, DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199603000-00012.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1994
Comparison of contrast enhanced CT and Mn-DPDP enhanced MRI for detection of focal hepatic lesions initial findings
Birnbaum B, Weinreb J, Fernandez M, Brown J, Rofsky N, Young S. Comparison of contrast enhanced CT and Mn-DPDP enhanced MRI for detection of focal hepatic lesions initial findings. Clinical Imaging 1994, 18: 21-27. PMID: 8180855, DOI: 10.1016/0899-7071(94)90141-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imagingMn-DPDPMore lesionsRetrospective multi-institutional studyExtensive metastatic diseaseHepatic magnetic resonance imagingMulti-institutional studyFocal hepatic diseaseFocal liver lesionsN'-dipyridoxylethylenediamineMetastatic diseaseIntravenous bolusDose groupFatty liverHepatic diseaseComparison of ContrastHepatic lesionsComputed tomographyLiver lesionsCT studiesPatientsMumol/Resonance imagingBolus contrastLesions
1992
Manganese (II) N,N'-dipyridoxylethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetate 5,5'-bis(phosphate): clinical experience with a new contrast agent.
Rofsky N, Weinreb J. Manganese (II) N,N'-dipyridoxylethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetate 5,5'-bis(phosphate): clinical experience with a new contrast agent. Magnetic Resonance Quarterly 1992, 8: 156-68. PMID: 1390058.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imagingMn-DPDPN'-dipyridoxylethylenediamineClinical experienceNon-enhanced T1Significant adverse eventsEnhanced magnetic resonance imagingManganese NT2-weighted imagesAdverse eventsHepatocellular originClinical trialsContrast agentsHepatobiliary agentsResonance imagingLiver imagingFavorable resultsLesion detectionNew contrast agentsIssues of safetyImaging techniquesAgentsImagingOptimal methodNumerous strategiesHepatic MR imaging with Mn-DPDP: safety, image quality, and sensitivity.
Bernardino M, Young S, Lee J, Weinreb J. Hepatic MR imaging with Mn-DPDP: safety, image quality, and sensitivity. Radiology 1992, 183: 53-8. PMID: 1549694, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549694.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMn-DPDPMore lesionsAdditional lesionsT1-weighted imagesDose groupSerious side effectsMagnetic resonance imagingT2-weighted imagesFocal hepatic diseaseN'-dipyridoxylethylenediamineIntravenous bolusHepatic diseaseMultiinstitutional studyPatientsSide effectsLesionsResonance imagingHepatic MRManganese NImaging parametersContrast agentsImagingGroupInfusionBolus
1991
Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver with Mn-DPDP for Known or Suspected Focal Hepatic Disease
BERNARDINO M, YOUNG S, LEE J, WEINREB J. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver with Mn-DPDP for Known or Suspected Focal Hepatic Disease. Investigative Radiology 1991, 26: s148-s149. PMID: 1808113, DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199111001-00050.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMagnetic Resonance Imaging of Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System
Kanzer G, Weinreb J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. Radiologic Clinics Of North America 1991, 29: 1259-1284. PMID: 1947045, DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02477-0.Peer-Reviewed Original Research