2021
Association between percentage of positive biopsy cores and risk of pelvic lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.
Yang D, Dee E, Arega M, Nguyen P, Orio P, King M, Kann B, Yu J, Cook K, Ma T, Kishan A, Muralidhar V. Association between percentage of positive biopsy cores and risk of pelvic lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 205-205. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.205.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercentage of positive biopsy coresRisk of pelvic lymph node involvementPelvic lymph node involvementLymph node involvementPositive biopsy coresPelvic lymph nodesProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyBiopsy coresNode involvementLymph nodesDefinitive treatment of prostate cancerGleason 9-10 diseasePositive pelvic lymph nodesTreatment of prostate cancerBiopsy Gleason scoreClinicopathological prognostic variablesElective nodal irradiationGleason 8 diseasePathologic nodal evaluationClinical tumor stageNational Cancer DatabaseTime of RPClinically relevant associationMultivariate logistic regression
2019
Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Kann BH, Hicks DF, Payabvash S, Mahajan A, Du J, Gupta V, Park HS, Yu JB, Yarbrough WG, Burtness BA, Husain ZA, Aneja S. Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 38: 1304-1311. PMID: 31815574, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02031.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeck squamous cell carcinomaExtranodal extensionSquamous cell carcinomaLymph nodesCell carcinomaContrast-enhanced CT scanDiagnostic abilityBoard-certified neuroradiologistsTreatment escalationCancer Genome AtlasPathologic confirmationPretreatment identificationDiagnostic challengeExternal validation data setsPathology resultsPretreatment imagingPoor prognosticatorClinical utilityCT scanPatientsClinical decisionHNSCCDiagnostic accuracyInstitutional ValidationGenome Atlas
2015
MP56-06 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PROVIDER-LEVEL FACTORS AND LYMPH NODE DISSECTION OUTCOMES DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE ANALYSIS
Kiechle J, Wang E, Yu J, Gross C, Abouassaly R, Cherullo E, Smaldone M, Shah N, Trinh Q, Sun M, Kim S. MP56-06 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PROVIDER-LEVEL FACTORS AND LYMPH NODE DISSECTION OUTCOMES DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE ANALYSIS. Journal Of Urology 2015, 193: e683. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAssociation between provider-level factors and lymph node dissection outcomes during radical prostatectomy: A national cancer database analysis.
Kiechle J, Wang E, Yu J, Gross C, Abouassaly R, Cherullo E, Smaldone M, Shah N, Trinh Q, Sun M, Kim S. Association between provider-level factors and lymph node dissection outcomes during radical prostatectomy: A national cancer database analysis. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 89-89. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.89.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPelvic lymph node dissectionHigh-risk prostate cancerLymph node countRobotic-assisted radical prostatectomyOpen radical prostatectomyRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerLymph nodesSurgical approachHospital characteristicsCommunity hospitalNode countNational Cancer Database AnalysisTime of RPUnderwent radical prostatectomyLymph node dissectionNational Cancer DatabaseLow-volume hospitalsProvider-level factorsPopulation-based cohortAggressive prostate cancerNode dissectionVolume hospitalsPrimary outcomeMultivariable analysis