Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiographic Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pre–Drug-Eluting Stent Era
Parise H, Maehara A, Stone G, Leon M, Mintz G. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiographic Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pre–Drug-Eluting Stent Era. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2011, 107: 374-382. PMID: 21257001, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalConceptsBare metal stent implantationMetal stent implantationMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionIVUS guidanceStent implantationAngiographic restenosisCardiac eventsCoronary interventionMyocardial infarctionIntravascular ultrasoundOverall major adverse cardiac eventsSingle-center studyAcute procedural resultsMinimum lumen diameterRevascularization ratesStent eraBalloon angioplastyProcedural resultsStent studiesAngiographic guidanceNoninferiority trialMeta-AnalysisLumen diameter