2019
Association between genetically predicted polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Harris HR, Cushing-Haugen KL, Webb PM, Nagle CM, Jordan SJ, Group A, Risch H, Rossing M, Doherty J, Goodman M, Modugno F, Ness R, Moysich K, Kjær S, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Schildkraut J, Berchuck A, Cramer D, Bandera E, Rodriguez L, Wentzensen N, Kotsopoulos J, Narod S, McLaughlin J, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Pearce C, Wu A, Lindström S, Terry K. Association between genetically predicted polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. International Journal Of Epidemiology 2019, 48: 822-830. PMID: 31211375, PMCID: PMC6659359, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz113.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPolycystic ovary syndromeOvarian cancer riskOvarian Cancer Association ConsortiumSelf-reported polycystic ovary syndromeInvasive ovarian cancerOvarian cancerCancer riskOvary syndromeInverse associationOral contraceptive useReproductive-aged womenBody mass indexSingle nucleotide polymorphismsStrong inverse associationComplex endocrine disorderObservational study resultsMendelian randomization studyEuropean ancestry womenEndometrioid tumorsMass indexDecreased riskEndocrine disordersSpecific histotypesContraceptive useAged womenNo Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Dong J, Gharahkhani P, Chow WH, Gammon MD, Liu G, Caldas C, Wu AH, Ye W, Onstad L, Anderson LA, Bernstein L, Pharoah PD, Risch HA, Corley DA, Fitzgerald RC, Consortium S, Iyer PG, Reid BJ, Lagergren J, Shaheen NJ, Vaughan TL, MacGregor S, Love S, Palles C, Tomlinson I, Gockel I, May A, Gerges C, Anders M, Böhmer AC, Becker J, Kreuser N, Thieme R, Noder T, Venerito M, Veits L, Schmidt T, Schmidt C, Izbicki JR, Hölscher AH, Lang H, Lorenz D, Schumacher B, Mayershofer R, Vashist Y, Ott K, Vieth M, Weismüller J, Nöthen MM, Moebus S, Knapp M, Peters WHM, Neuhaus H, Rösch T, Ell C, Jankowski J, Schumacher J, Neale RE, Whiteman DC, Thrift AP. No Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology 2019, 17: 2227-2235.e1. PMID: 30716477, PMCID: PMC6675666, DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of BEMendelian randomization studyBarrett's esophagusEsophageal adenocarcinomaInverse variance weightingRandomization studyRisk of EACHydroxy vitamin DVitamin D statusVariance weightingEsophageal Adenocarcinoma ConsortiumD statusEAC riskVitamin DOdds ratioBE riskEsophagusAbstractTextL increaseSingle nucleotide polymorphismsConflicting resultsAdenocarcinomaPatientsSNP associationsRisk
2017
Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Ong J, Hwang L, Cuellar-Partida G, Martin N, Chenevix-Trench G, Quinn M, Cornelis M, Gharahkhani P, Webb P, MacGregor S, Ong J, Hwang L, Cuellar-Partida G, Bryne E, Fasching P, Hein A, Burghaus S, Beckmann M, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Vanderstichele A, Swerdlow A, Jones M, Orr N, Schoemaker M, Edwards D, Brenton J, Benítez J, García M, Rodriguez-Antona C, Rossing M, Fortner R, Riboli E, Chang-Claude J, Eilber U, Wang-Gohrke S, Yannoukakos D, Goodman M, Bogdanova N, Dörk T, Duerst M, Hillemanns P, Runnebaum I, Antonenkova N, Butzow R, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari L, Edwards R, Kelley J, Modugno F, Moysich K, Ness R, Cannioto R, Heitz F, Karlan B, Olsson H, Kjaer S, Jensen A, Giles G, Bruinsma F, Hildebrandt M, Liang D, Wu X, Le Marchand L, Setiawan V, Permuth J, Bisogna M, Dao F, Levine D, Cramer D, Terry K, Tworoger S, Stampfer M, Willet W, Missmer S, Bjorge L, Kopperud R, Bischof K, Thomsen L, Kiemeney L, Massuger L, Pejovic T, Brooks-Wilson A, Olson S, McGuire V, Rothstein J, Sieh W, Whittemore A, Cook L, Le N, Gilks C, Gronwald J, Jakubowska A, Lubiński J, Kluz T, Wentzensen N, Brinton L, Trabert B, Lissowska J, Høgdall E, Høgdall C, Sandler D, Wolk A, Tyrer J, Song H, Eccles D, Campbell I, Glasspool R, McNeish I, Paul J, Siddiqui N, Sutphen R, McLaughlin J, Phelan C, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, May T, Gayther S, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Ramus S, Wu A, Huntsman D, deFazio A, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Kupryjanczyk J, Moes-Sosnowska J, Szafron L, Cunningham J, Winham S, Risch H, Goode E, Schildkraut J, Pearce C, Berchuck A, Pharoah P, Martin N, Chenevix-Trench G, Quinn M, Cornelis M, Gharahkhani P, Webb P, MacGregor S. Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. International Journal Of Epidemiology 2017, 47: 450-459. PMID: 29186515, PMCID: PMC6186013, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx236.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEpithelial ovarian cancerOvarian Cancer Association ConsortiumOvarian cancerObservational studyCoffee consumptionEOC riskEOC casesHigh-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancerMendelian randomizationSerous epithelial ovarian cancerModerate coffee consumptionHigh-grade serous casesMendelian randomization studyTwo-sample Mendelian randomizationAdditional cupProtective associationCaffeine consumptionHealth outcomesEarlier observational studiesRandomization studySerous casesStrong associationSingle nucleotide polymorphismsCaffeine levelsCancer
2016
Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Ong JS, Cuellar-Partida G, Lu Y, Study A, Fasching P, Hein A, Burghaus S, Beckmann M, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Vanderstichele A, Doherty J, Rossing M, Chang-Claude J, Eilber U, Rudolph A, Wang-Gohrke S, Goodman M, Bogdanova N, Dörk T, Dürst M, Hillemanns P, Runnebaum I, Antonenkova N, Butzow R, Leminen A, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari L, Edwards R, Kelley J, Modugno F, Moysich K, Ness R, Cannioto R, Høgdall E, Høgdall C, Jensen A, Giles G, Bruinsma F, Kjaer S, Hildebrandt M, Liang D, Lu K, Wu X, Bisogna M, Dao F, Levine D, Cramer D, Terry K, Tworoger S, Stampfer M, Missmer S, Bjorge L, Salvesen H, Kopperud R, Bischof K, Aben K, Kiemeney L, Massuger L, Brooks-Wilson A, Olson S, McGuire V, Rothstein J, Sieh W, Whittemore A, Cook L, Le N, Gilks C, Gronwald J, Jakubowska A, Lubiński J, Kluz T, Song H, Tyrer J, Wentzensen N, Brinton L, Trabert B, Lissowska J, McLaughlin J, Narod S, Phelan C, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Eccles D, Campbell I, Gayther S, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Ramus S, Wu A, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Kupryjanczyk J, Timorek A, Szafron L, Cunningham J, Fridley B, Winham S, Bandera E, Poole E, Morgan T, Risch H, Goode E, Schildkraut J, Pearce C, Berchuck A, Pharoah P, Chenevix-Trench G, Gharahkhani P, Neale R, Webb P, MacGregor S. Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. International Journal Of Epidemiology 2016, 45: 1619-1630. PMID: 27594614, PMCID: PMC5100621, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw207.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVitamin D levelsOvarian cancerVitamin DD levelsOdds ratioObservational studySingle nucleotide polymorphismsD concentrationsPlasma vitamin D levelsHigh-grade serous ovarian cancerHigh-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancerMendelian randomizationSerous epithelial ovarian cancerEpithelial ovarian cancer riskEpithelial ovarian cancerOvarian cancer riskOvarian Cancer Association ConsortiumSerous ovarian cancerObservational epidemiological studiesTwo-sample MR approachInverse variance weightingMendelian randomization studyOvarian cancer susceptibilityCancer preventionCancer riskAdult body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer by subtype: a Mendelian randomization study
Dixon SC, Nagle CM, Thrift AP, Pharoah PD, Pearce CL, Zheng W, Painter JN, Study A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fasching P, Beckmann M, Lambrechts D, Vergote I, Lambrechts S, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Rossing M, Doherty J, Wicklund K, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Moysich K, Odunsi K, Goodman M, Wilkens L, Thompson P, Shvetsov Y, Dörk T, Park-Simon T, Hillemanns P, Bogdanova N, Butzow R, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari L, Leminen A, Modugno F, Ness R, Edwards R, Kelley J, Heitz F, Karlan B, Kjær S, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Goode E, Fridley B, Cunningham J, Winham S, Giles G, Bruinsma F, Milne R, Southey M, Hildebrandt M, Wu X, Lu K, Liang D, Levine D, Bisogna M, Schildkraut J, Berchuck A, Cramer D, Terry K, Bandera E, Olson S, Salvesen H, Thomsen L, Kopperud R, Bjorge L, Kiemeney L, Massuger L, Pejovic T, Cook L, Le N, Swenerton K, Brooks-Wilson A, Kelemen L, Lubiński J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Menkiszak J, Wentzensen N, Brinton L, Yang H, Lissowska J, Høgdall C, Lundvall L, Song H, Tyrer J, Campbell I, Eccles D, Paul J, Glasspool R, Siddiqui N, Whittemore A, Sieh W, McGuire V, Rothstein J, Narod S, Phelan C, Risch H, McLaughlin J, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Menon U, Gayther S, Ramus S, Gentry-Maharaj A, Wu A, Pike M, Tseng C, Kupryjanczyk J, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Budzilowska A, Spiewankiewicz B, Webb P, Consortium O. Adult body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer by subtype: a Mendelian randomization study. International Journal Of Epidemiology 2016, 45: 884-895. PMID: 27401727, PMCID: PMC5644573, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw158.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllelesBody Mass IndexFemaleGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansLogistic ModelsMendelian Randomization AnalysisMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesityOvarian NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsYoung AdultConceptsBody mass indexOvarian cancerSerous cancerMass indexOdds ratioObservational studyMendelian randomizationStudy-specific odds ratiosHigher body mass indexAdult body mass indexGrade serous ovarian cancerConfidence intervalsOvarian cancer riskOvarian Cancer Association ConsortiumSerous ovarian cancerWeighted genetic risk scoreLack of associationMendelian randomization studyGenetic risk scoreStrength of associationHistological subtypesRisk factorsCancer riskRisk scoreHGSC subtype
2014
Obesity and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s Esophagus: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Thrift AP, Shaheen NJ, Gammon MD, Bernstein L, Reid BJ, Onstad L, Risch HA, Liu G, Bird NC, Wu AH, Corley DA, Romero Y, Chanock SJ, Chow WH, Casson AG, Levine DM, Zhang R, Ek WE, MacGregor S, Ye W, Hardie LJ, Vaughan TL, Whiteman DC. Obesity and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s Esophagus: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2014, 106: dju252. PMID: 25269698, PMCID: PMC4200028, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju252.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusBody Mass IndexEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedObesityPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrecancerous ConditionsPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsConceptsBody mass indexBarrett's esophagusEsophageal adenocarcinomaGenetic risk scoreConventional epidemiologic analysisRisk scoreEpidemiologic analysisRisk of EACLifetime body mass indexInstrumental variable analysisGastroesophageal reflux symptomsMendelian randomization studyMendelian randomization approachGenetic susceptibility studiesGenetic propensityReflux symptomsMass indexEAC riskPotential confoundersEsophageal metaplasiaObservational studyHigh riskObesityUnconfounded effectRandomization studyRisk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Decreases With Height, Based on Consortium Analysis and Confirmed by Mendelian Randomization
Thrift AP, Risch HA, Onstad L, Shaheen NJ, Casson AG, Bernstein L, Corley DA, Levine DM, Chow W, Reid BJ, Romero Y, Hardie LJ, Liu G, Wu AH, Bird NC, Gammon MD, Ye W, Whiteman DC, Vaughan TL. Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Decreases With Height, Based on Consortium Analysis and Confirmed by Mendelian Randomization. Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology 2014, 12: 1667-1676.e1. PMID: 24530603, PMCID: PMC4130803, DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.039.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of EACBarrett's esophagusEsophageal adenocarcinomaMendelian randomization analysisOdds ratioCases of BEGastroesophageal reflux symptomsStrata of ageRandomization analysisBody mass indexMultivariable logistic regressionClinical risk stratificationEsophageal Adenocarcinoma ConsortiumMendelian randomization studyGenetic risk scoreConventional epidemiologic analysisReflux symptomsRisk stratificationMass indexInverse associationRisk scoreUnconfounded effectRandomization studyAbstractTextEpidemiologic analysis