2019
Comparison of Conventional TNM and Novel TNMB Staging Systems for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Haro GJ, Sheu B, Cook NR, Woodard GA, Mann MJ, Kratz JR. Comparison of Conventional TNM and Novel TNMB Staging Systems for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2019, 2: e1917062. PMID: 31808928, PMCID: PMC6902768, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17062.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-small cell lung cancerTNM staging systemDisease-free survivalHigh-risk patientsCell lung cancerStaging systemEighth editionSurgical resectionLung cancerConventional TNMPrognostic classifierNonsquamous non-small cell lung cancerQuaternary care medical centerDisease-free survival ratesHigh molecular riskSurvival 3 yearsEarly-stage diseaseConventional TNM stagingCritical unmet needCohort studyPrimary outcomeConsecutive seriesTNM stagingMolecular riskConcordance index
2017
2460
Wang S, Woodard G, Lucas C, Rogers S, Jablons D. 2460. Journal Of Clinical And Translational Science 2017, 1: 79-79. PMCID: PMC6799655, DOI: 10.1017/cts.2017.280.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIvor Lewis esophagectomyILE patientsAntibiotic durationAntibiotic prophylaxisPostoperative pneumoniaRate of pneumoniaRetrospective cohort studyShort-term outcomesLength of stayFischer's exact testMedication administration recordsInvasive surgical proceduresHospital stayCohort studySecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeRespiratory infectionsAntibiotic stewardshipPatient outcomesSurgical proceduresHigh incidencePneumoniaExact testPatientsAdministration records
2014
Prognostic Molecular Assay Might Improve Identification of Patients At Risk for Recurrence in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Woodard GA, Gubens MA, Jahan TM, Jones KD, Kukreja J, Theodore PR, Cardozo S, Jew G, Clary-Macy C, Jablons DM, Mann MJ. Prognostic Molecular Assay Might Improve Identification of Patients At Risk for Recurrence in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer 2014, 15: 426-432. PMID: 25258195, DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.07.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk patientsLow-risk patientsStage IBNCCN criteriaNCCN guidelinesRisk stratificationHigh-risk clinicopathologic featuresEarly-stage NSCLC patientsAdjuvant chemotherapy recommendationsMonths of patientsMolecular risk stratificationCell lung cancerIdentification of patientsSmall cohort studiesMolecular risk assessmentBlinded chart reviewMolecular assaysAdjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy recommendationsNonsquamous NSCLCStage IAChart reviewCohort studyNSCLC patientsRecurrence outcomes
2012
Laparoscopic vs Open Gastric Bypass Surgery: Differences in Patient Demographics, Safety, and Outcomes
Banka G, Woodard G, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton JM. Laparoscopic vs Open Gastric Bypass Surgery: Differences in Patient Demographics, Safety, and Outcomes. JAMA Surgery 2012, 147: 550-556. PMID: 22786543, DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.195.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLRYGB patientsGastric bypassMore complicationsOpen gastric bypass surgeryQuality Patient Safety IndicatorsRetrospective cohort studyGastric bypass surgeryHigh-volume hospitalsLonger median lengthNationwide Inpatient SamplePopulation-based studyLength of stayPatient safety indicatorsLower odds ratioHigher total chargesNumber of proceduresLRYGB cohortsNonroutine dispositionLaparoscopic RouxOpen RouxBypass surgeryPatient demographicsCohort studyComorbidity differencesMedian length