1998
Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists.
Spiegelman D, Valanis B. Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists. American Journal Of Public Health 1998, 88: 406-12. PMID: 9518972, PMCID: PMC1508329, DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.406.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMeasurement error modelInterval estimatesExposure measurement errorMeasurement errorError modelPrevalence ratiosRelative riskLikelihood-based methodsLog relative riskNondifferential measurement errorStatistical methodsRelative risk estimatesOutcomes of interestOccupational exposurePublic health researchHospital pharmacistsLogistic regressionRisk estimatesWeekly numberFirst methodHealth effectsUsual pointHealth researchErrorPharmacists
1997
Statistical issues in assessing human population exposures
Weller E, Ryan L, Spiegelman D, Smith T. Statistical issues in assessing human population exposures. Chemometrics And Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1997, 37: 189-195. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(97)00003-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDose-response relationshipStatistical issuesExposure-dose relationshipsMeasurement error problemsPrimary scientific interestHealth effectsStatistical aspectsStatistical methodsEnvironmental epidemiology studiesHealth outcomesEpidemiology studiesHuman population exposureExposure levelsMeasurement errorExposure assessmentError problemDirect applicationWelding fumesLoss of efficiencyExposureOutcomesPopulation exposureDose