2020
The impact of delirium on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment after intracerebral hemorrhage.
Reznik ME, Moody S, Murray K, Costa S, Grory BM, Madsen TE, Mahta A, Wendell LC, Thompson BB, Rao SS, Stretz C, Sheth KN, Hwang DY, Zahuranec DB, Schrag M, Daiello LA, Asaad WF, Jones RN, Furie KL. The impact of delirium on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2020, 95: e2727-e2735. PMID: 32913011, PMCID: PMC7734724, DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010738.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsImpact of deliriumIntracerebral hemorrhageLife-sustaining treatmentScore-based modelSingle-center cohort studyCox regression modelCharacteristic curve analysisDSM-5 criteriaHospital daysCohort studyConsecutive patientsMedian timeDelirium groupPoor outcomeDeliriumWLSTPatientsLogistic regressionCurve analysisHemorrhage
2019
Gap Analysis Regarding Prognostication in Neurocritical Care: A Joint Statement from the German Neurocritical Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Society
Wartenberg KE, Hwang DY, Haeusler K, Muehlschlegel S, Sakowitz OW, Madžar D, Hamer HM, Rabinstein AA, Greer DM, Hemphill JC, Meixensberger J, Varelas PN. Gap Analysis Regarding Prognostication in Neurocritical Care: A Joint Statement from the German Neurocritical Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocritical Care 2019, 31: 231-244. PMID: 31368059, PMCID: PMC6757096, DOI: 10.1007/s12028-019-00769-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeurocritical Care SocietyNeurocritical carePrognostic modelNeurocritical care conditionsNumerous prognostic modelsEvidence-based guidelinesCurrent prognostic modelsMost prognostic modelsProcess of prognosticationMedical comorbiditiesMost patientsNeurocritical illnessCare parametersClinical studiesCare conditionsMethodsAs partPrognosticationRoutine partQualitative gap analysisCareFuture studiesSignificant gapJoint statementAbsence of integrationGuidelines
2017
Factors Considered by Clinicians when Prognosticating Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes
Hwang DY, Chu SY, Dell CA, Sparks MJ, Watson TD, Langefeld CD, Comeau ME, Rosand J, Battey TWK, Koch S, Perez ML, James ML, McFarlin J, Osborne JL, Woo D, Kittner SJ, Sheth KN. Factors Considered by Clinicians when Prognosticating Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes. Neurocritical Care 2017, 27: 316-325. PMID: 28744847, DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0430-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntracerebral hemorrhageRadiographic factorsMethodsThis prospective observational studyClinical scalesPre-existing comorbiditiesProspective observational studyIntracerebral hemorrhage outcomesSubjective clinical judgmentJudgment of physiciansRankin ScaleICH patientsFunctional outcomeUS CentersObservational studyPrognostic scalesClinical teamClinical judgmentFUNC scoreNursesPhysiciansExamination componentsPatientsOutcomesPrognosticationClinicians
2015
Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes
Hwang DY, Dell CA, Sparks MJ, Watson TD, Langefeld CD, Comeau ME, Rosand J, Battey TW, Koch S, Perez ML, James ML, McFarlin J, Osborne JL, Woo D, Kittner SJ, Sheth KN. Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes. Neurology 2015, 86: 126-133. PMID: 26674335, PMCID: PMC4731687, DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsModified Rankin ScaleICH scoreIntracerebral hemorrhageSubjective clinical judgmentFUNC scorePhysicians' predictionsPrognostic scalesClinical teamClinical judgmentUS tertiary care centerPatient's clinical teamTertiary care centerProspective observational studyIntracerebral hemorrhage outcomesSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhageRankin ScaleComfort careICH patientsFunctional outcomeCare centerPatient admissionsObservational studyComfort measuresPrognostic instrumentNeurologic practice