2024
Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Ross A. Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39098389, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecipher genomic classifierRisk of metastasisBiochemical recurrenceRadical prostatectomyGenomic classifierDecipher testProstate cancerProstate Risk Assessment Postsurgical ScoreRisk of biochemical recurrencePatient's prostate cancerRisk of cancer recurrencePathological risk factorsProstate cancer outcomesCox proportional hazards regressionRetrospective cohort studyElectronic health record dataReal-world settingsProportional hazards regressionHealth record dataReal-world practice settingsProstate biopsyRP specimensOncological outcomesPrognostic significanceMedian ageDevelopment of a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic and Clinical Data Linkage
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Ross A, Sprenkle P. Development of a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic and Clinical Data Linkage. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2417274. PMID: 38874922, PMCID: PMC11179136, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17274.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsElectronic health recordsCancer diagnosisClinical data linkageMedicine Clinical TermsPatterns of careProstate cancer diagnosisRadical prostatectomyCancer risk stratificationData linkageHealth recordsClinical dataMain OutcomesCancer outcomesClinical juncturesClinical careCommon Procedural Terminology codesAdministrative dataDiagnosis codesLongitudinal clinical dataCohort studyPharmacy recordsGenomic classifierProcedural Terminology codesDevelopment of prostate cancer metastasisLinkage data
2021
The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rajwa P, Mori K, Huebner NA, Martin DT, Sprenkle PC, Weinreb JC, Ploussard G, Pradere B, Shariat SF, Leapman MS. The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal Of Urology 2021, 206: 507-516. PMID: 33904755, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001821.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of BCRPI-RADS v2 scoreDefinitive local therapyBiochemical recurrencePrognostic significanceRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerV2 scoreLocal therapySystematic reviewMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classificationPrimary definitive treatmentIndependent prognostic significanceRisk of biasSignificant prostate cancerProstate Imaging ReportingPI-RADS v2Prostate cancer diagnosisWeb of ScienceReliable diagnostic toolOncologic outcomesDefinitive treatmentMRI findingsPI-RADSPrognostic associationDoubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy
Ghabili K, Paulson N, Syed JS, Nawaf CB, Khajir G, Martin DT, Onofrey J, Leapman MS, Levi A, Weinreb JC, Humphrey PA, Sprenkle PC. Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy. Case Reports In Urology 2021, 2021: 2687416. PMID: 33936831, PMCID: PMC8054861, DOI: 10.1155/2021/2687416.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBiopsy scoreRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceBiopsy Gleason grade groupGleason grade group 2Gleason grade group 4Low-risk prostate cancerActive surveillance populationGrade group 4Subsequent surveillance biopsiesOrgan-confined diseaseGrade group 2Gleason grade groupLow-risk categoryBiopsy reclassificationDisease reclassificationSurveillance biopsiesFinal pathologyThird biopsySecond biopsySurveillance populationProstate cancerAdverse featuresGroup 2Genomic score
2018
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies
Martin DT, Ghabili K, Levi A, Humphrey PA, Sprenkle PC. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies. Urology 2018, 125: 64-72. PMID: 30552940, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADSv2 scoreDecipher scoreProstate Imaging ReportingDecipher testingTargeted biopsiesRadical prostatectomyData System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoreFavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancer patientsGleason Grade Group 1Imaging ReportingIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMultivariable logistic regression analysisHigh-risk diseasePI-RADS 4Grade group 1Gleason grade groupProstate cancer patientsMultiparametric magnetic resonancePI-RADS scoreVersion 2 scoreData System scoreLogistic regression analysisSignificant differencesPI-RADS category