2022
Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis
Lansky AJ, Tirziu D, Moses JW, Pietras C, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW, Ekono MM, Grines CL, Parise H. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2022, 185: 29-36. PMID: 36210212, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk percutaneous coronary interventionIntra-aortic balloon pumpPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute kidney injuryCardiogenic shockMyocardial infarctionIABP supportKidney injuryBalloon pumpImproved survivalPropensity adjustmentAcute ST-elevation myocardial infarctionST-elevation myocardial infarctionIndex hospitalization lengthLess myocardial infarctionPremier Healthcare DatabaseHospital myocardial infarctionPropensity-adjusted analysisMechanical circulatory supportMechanical support devicesImpella useHospital survivalIndex hospitalizationCoronary interventionReal-world practice
2014
Prognostic Value of Angiographic Lesion Complexity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial)
Goto K, Lansky AJ, Ng VG, Pietras C, Nargileci E, Mehran R, Parise H, Feit F, Ohman EM, White HD, Bertrand ME, Desmet W, Hamon M, Stone GW. Prognostic Value of Angiographic Lesion Complexity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2014, 114: 1638-1645. PMID: 25312637, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAnticoagulantsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHemorrhageHeparinHirudinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationOdds RatioPeptide FragmentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexPrognosisRecombinant ProteinsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeType C lesionsGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsIIb/IIIa inhibitorsC lesionsLesion complexityBivalirudin monotherapyComposite ischemiaCoronary syndromeCoronary interventionIschemic eventsMyocardial infarctionCardiology/American Heart Association classificationAdverse short-term prognosisAmerican Heart Association classificationAdverse ischemic eventsComposite ischemic eventsContemporary interventional therapyMajor bleeding complicationsMajor hemorrhagic complicationsShort-term prognosisAcute CatheterizationAntithrombotic regimensMajor bleeding
2008
Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Results from the CADILLAC trial
Lansky AJ, Tsuchiya Y, Brener M, Mehran R, Cristea E, Pietras C, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Leon MB, Moses J, Stone GW. Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Results from the CADILLAC trial. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2008, 72: 917-924. PMID: 19016469, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21714.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbciximabAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalAspirinClopidogrelCoronary AngiographyDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFemaleHemorrhageHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentStentsThrombosisTiclopidineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionPrimary stentingCADILLAC trialRecurrent ischemiaSevere bleedingMyocardial infarctionEfficacy of clopidogrelMore recurrent ischemiaTIMI 0/1 flowSimilar clinical outcomesTiclopidine treatmentAngiographic characteristicsClopidogrel useIndependent predictorsClinical outcomesMultivariable analysisRandomized trialsStent thrombosisStent implantationOperator's discretionClopidogrelStentingPatientsTiclopidineRelative safety
2005
Gender Differences in Outcomes After Primary Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting With and Without Abciximab for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Lansky AJ, Pietras C, Costa RA, Tsuchiya Y, Brodie BR, Cox DA, Aymong ED, Stuckey TD, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Mehran R, Negoita M, Fahy M, Cristea E, Turco M, Leon MB, Grines CL, Stone GW. Gender Differences in Outcomes After Primary Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting With and Without Abciximab for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2005, 111: 1611-1618. PMID: 15811868, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000160362.55803.40.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionPrimary stentingAddition of abciximabBody surface areaCADILLAC trialMyocardial infarctionRisk factorsFemale genderIschemic target vessel revascularizationLower body surface areaMajor adverse cardiac eventsOverall adverse outcomesTIMI grade 3Adverse cardiac eventsTarget vessel revascularizationClinical risk factorsComorbid risk factorsInterventional treatment strategiesImportant independent determinantHigh mortality rateMACE ratePrimary angioplastyCardiac eventsSymptom onsetIndependent predictors