Boosted Lopinavir– Versus Boosted Atazanavir–Containing Regimens and Immunologic, Virologic, and Clinical Outcomes: A Prospective Study of HIV-Infected Individuals in High-Income Countries
Cain L, Phillips A, Olson A, Sabin C, Jose S, Justice A, Tate J, Logan R, Robins J, Sterne J, van Sighem A, Reiss P, Young J, Fehr J, Touloumi G, Paparizos V, Esteve A, Casabona J, Monge S, Moreno S, Seng R, Meyer L, Pérez-Hoyos S, Muga R, Dabis F, Vandenhende M, Abgrall S, Costagliola D, Hernán M. Boosted Lopinavir– Versus Boosted Atazanavir–Containing Regimens and Immunologic, Virologic, and Clinical Outcomes: A Prospective Study of HIV-Infected Individuals in High-Income Countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2015, 60: 1262-1268. PMID: 25567330, PMCID: PMC4447777, DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu1167.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAtazanavir regimenVirologic failureProspective studyNucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backboneFirst-line antiretroviral regimensReverse transcriptase inhibitor backboneAIDS-free individualsTreat hazard ratiosCD4 cell countCurrent clinical guidelinesHuman immunodeficiency virusRandomized clinical trialsAdjusted intentionAntiretroviral regimensAtazanavir groupBoosted atazanavirContaining RegimensVirologic outcomesCD4 countNRTI backboneHazard ratioClinical outcomesImmunodeficiency virusClinical guidelinesClinical trials