Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naïve, Transfusion-Dependent (TD), Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS): Results from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Oliva E, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R, Pelligra C, Guo S, Lord-Bessen J, Xiao H, Yucel A, Miteva D, Rose S, Kreitz S, Sekeres M, Zeidan A. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naïve, Transfusion-Dependent (TD), Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS): Results from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4596. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-174660.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesEORTC QLQ-C30Patient-reported outcomesErythropoietin-stimulating agentsEpoetin alfaQLQ-C30FACT-AnSustained improvementTreatment armsESA-naïveTransfusion-DependentTreatment tolerabilityStratified Cox proportional hazards regression modelDay 1Cox proportional hazards regression modelCancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaireLife Questionnaire Core 30Proportional hazards regression modelsMajority of patientsTreatment side effectsPost-baseline visitTransfusion-dependent patientsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsHazards regression modelsPhase 3