2024
Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML
Alhajahjeh A, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Huntington S, Stahl M, Goshua G, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, ahead-of-print: 1-9. PMID: 39560957, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2426073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConventional care regimensOlder patientsTreatment of older patientsIDH2 inhibitor enasidenibIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesR/R AMLRefractory/relapsed AMLEvent-freeCost-effective treatmentEnasidenibCare regimensAMLPatientsCost-effectiveIncremental costLife yearsConventional careR/RIncremental effectSurvivalTreatmentCost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia
Bewersdorf J, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Stahl M, Stein E, Huntington S, Goshua G, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, 65: 1136-1144. PMID: 38648559, PMCID: PMC11265977, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2344052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchQuality-adjusted life yearsCompletion of consolidation therapyFLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesImproved overall survivalHematopoietic cell transplantationPartitioned survival analysis modelAcute myeloid leukemiaCost-effectiveness ratioFLT3 inhibitor quizartinibHealth economic implicationsConsolidation therapyInduction chemotherapyAverage wholesale priceOverall survivalCell transplantationContinuous therapyMyeloid leukemiaITD mutationQuizartinibIncremental costCost-effective optionLife years
2019
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy (SC) for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) FLT3-Mutated (FLT3 mut+) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Zeidan A, Qi C, Pandya B, Garnham A, Yang H, Shah M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy (SC) for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) FLT3-Mutated (FLT3 mut+) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood 2019, 134: 3859. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123819.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantationEvent-free survivalAcute myeloid leukemiaIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioUS third-party payer perspectiveThird-party payer perspectiveProbabilistic sensitivity analysesSalvage chemotherapyADMIRAL trialOverall survivalEfficacy inputsDeterministic sensitivity analysesIncremental costPayer perspectiveLifetime horizonAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationFavorable cost-effectiveness profileHealth statesPost-progression treatmentTerminal care costsTreatment of RelapsedActive treatment optionsEffective therapeutic optionLong-term survivorsTreatment costs