2023
Standardising acute myeloid leukaemia classification systems: a perspective from a panel of international experts
Shallis R, Daver N, Altman J, Komrokji R, Pollyea D, Badar T, Bewersdorf J, Bhatt V, de Botton S, de la Fuente Burguera A, Carraway H, Desai P, Dillon R, Duployez N, El Chaer F, Fathi A, Freeman S, Gojo I, Grunwald M, Jonas B, Konopleva M, Lin T, Mannis G, Mascarenhas J, Michaelis L, Mims A, Montesinos P, Pozdnyakova O, Pratz K, Schuh A, Sekeres M, Smith C, Stahl M, Subklewe M, Uy G, Voso M, Walter R, Wang E, Zeidner J, Žučenka A, Zeidan A. Standardising acute myeloid leukaemia classification systems: a perspective from a panel of international experts. The Lancet Haematology 2023, 10: e767-e776. PMID: 37572683, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00159-x.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaMyeloid leukemiaClinical trial eligibilityInternational consensus classificationHeath care providersHealth care providersTrial eligibilityClassification systemResponse assessmentDisease definitionConsensus classificationPatientsDrug developmentLeukemiaConsistent management strategiesInternational expertsRegulatory pathwaysProvidersHematopathologistsCliniciansDiagnosis
2020
Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey
Pine AB, Chokr N, Stahl M, Steensma DP, Sekeres MA, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Stone RM, Greenberg PL, Bejar R, Bewersdorf JP, Gore SD, Zeidan AM. Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2020, 61: 1455-1464. PMID: 32026740, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1723013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationMolecular profilingNext-generation sequencingWeb-based surveyRole of NGSManagement of patientsUtility of NGSEvidence-based guidelinesHealth care providersLarge web-based surveyMDS patientsPractice patternsTreatment decisionsCare providersResponse assessmentProviders' beliefsPatientsInstitutional guidelinesGene mutationsDiagnosisSyndromeTesting logisticsInterpretation of resultsWide variation
2018
Wide Variation in Use and Interpretation of Gene Mutation Profiling Panels Among Health Care Providers of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of a Large Web-Based Survey
Pine A, Chokr N, Stahl M, Steensma D, Sekeres M, Litzow M, Luger S, Stone R, Greenberg P, Bejar R, Gore S, Zeidan A. Wide Variation in Use and Interpretation of Gene Mutation Profiling Panels Among Health Care Providers of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of a Large Web-Based Survey. Blood 2018, 132: 1825. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-113888.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGene mutation profilingSouthwest Oncology GroupMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationHealth care providersMutation profilingOncology GroupMDS patientsClinical trialsCare providersWeb-based surveyConsensus evidence-based guidelinesInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupGene panelAdvisory CommitteeConventional prognostic modelsThird of respondersHigh-risk patientsCooperative Oncology GroupPrognostic scoring systemRisk stratification toolManagement of patientsStem cell transplantEvidence-based guidelines
2012
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Practices Among Health Care Providers Caring for Patients Hospitalized for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A International Web-Based Survey
Zeidan A, Wellman J, Forde P, Bolaños-Meade J, Streiff M. Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Practices Among Health Care Providers Caring for Patients Hospitalized for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A International Web-Based Survey. Blood 2012, 120: 2062. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v120.21.2062.2062.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantPharmacologic VTE prophylaxisVTE prophylaxisVTE preventionHSCT patientsVenous thromboembolismWeb-based surveyInternational web-based surveyJohns Hopkins Institutional Review BoardAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantPrevention practicesHematopoietic stem cell transplantationThird of respondersStem cell transplantBone marrow transplantationPlatelet count thresholdStem cell transplantationEvidence-based recommendationsQuestion web-based surveyMajority of respondersHealth care providersPercent of respondersHealth care professionalsPost-fellowship experienceInstitutional review board