2023
Data-Driven Harmonization of 2022 Who and ICC Classifications of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS): A Study By the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)
Lanino L, Ball S, Bewersdorf J, Marchetti M, Maggioni G, Travaglino E, Al Ali N, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Singh A, Jain A, Aguirre L, Tinsley-Vance S, Schwabkey Z, Chan O, Xie Z, Brunner A, Kuykendall A, Bennett J, Buckstein R, Bejar R, Carraway H, DeZern A, Griffiths E, Halene S, Hasserjian R, Lancet J, List A, Loghavi S, Odenike O, Padron E, Patnaik M, Roboz G, Stahl M, Sekeres M, Steensma D, Savona M, Taylor J, Xu M, Sweet K, Sallman D, Nimer S, Hourigan C, Wei A, Sauta E, D'Amico S, Asti G, Castellani G, Borate U, Sanz G, Efficace F, Gore S, Kim T, Daver N, Garcia-Manero G, Rozman M, Orfao A, Wang S, Foucar M, Germing U, Haferlach T, Scheinberg P, Miyazaki Y, Iastrebner M, Kulasekararaj A, Cluzeau T, Kordasti S, van de Loosdrecht A, Ades L, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Della Porta M. Data-Driven Harmonization of 2022 Who and ICC Classifications of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS): A Study By the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS). Blood 2023, 142: 998. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-186580.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBlast countMost patientsTP53 mutationsTET2 mutationsChromosomal abnormalitiesMore TP53 mutationsBone marrow blastsGene mutationsSF3B1 mutationsClinical decision-making processHigh-risk mutationsMarrow blastsMultilineage dysplasiaPatient characteristicsAML patientsClinical entityInternational cohortSHAP analysisMDS casesPatientsClinical relevanceCytogenetic abnormalitiesClinical settingComplex karyotypeU2AF1 mutationsImpact of Genomic Landscape and Mutational Burden on Primary Endpoint Responses in the COMMANDS Study
Komrokji R, Guerrero M, Garcia-Manero G, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Hayati S, Vodala S. Impact of Genomic Landscape and Mutational Burden on Primary Endpoint Responses in the COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4591. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178689.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsSuperior clinical benefitLR-MDSClinical benefitSimilar response ratesResponse rateRisk groupsMutational burdenGene mutationsRing sideroblastsRed blood cell transfusionInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemShorter leukemia-free survivalBaseline erythropoietin levelsComparable clinical benefitFavorable clinical benefitBlood cell transfusionLeukemia-free survivalProgression-free survivalSimilar clinical benefitsPrimary endpoint analysisPrognostic scoring systemBone marrow samplesSignificant differencesDriver gene mutationsCombining Gene Mutation with Transcriptomic Data Improves Outcome Prediction in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Sauta E, Zampini M, Dall'Olio D, Sala C, Todisco G, Travaglino E, Lanino L, Tentori C, Maggioni G, D'Amico S, Asti G, Dall'Olio L, Mosca E, Ubezio M, Campagna A, Riva E, Bicchieri M, Savevski V, Santoro A, Kordasti S, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Kubasch A, Platzbecker U, Fenaux P, Zhao L, Zeidan A, Haferlach T, Castellani G, Della Porta M. Combining Gene Mutation with Transcriptomic Data Improves Outcome Prediction in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2023, 142: 1863. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-186222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myeloid leukemiaProportional hazards modelOverall survivalClinical outcomesMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical featuresMDS patientsPrognostic informationConcordance indexCox proportional hazards modelConventional prognostic scoresIPSS-R scorePrimary end pointBone marrow blastsHarrell's concordance indexPeripheral blood cytopeniasPrognostic scoring systemRisk of progressionAdditional prognostic informationCytogenetic alterationsGene mutationsIndividual patient levelSame clinical phenotypeBlood cytopeniasMarrow blastsAn overview of novel therapies in advanced clinical testing for acute myeloid leukemia
Venugopal S, Xie Z, Zeidan A. An overview of novel therapies in advanced clinical testing for acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Review Of Hematology 2023, 16: 109-119. PMID: 36718500, DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2174521.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAML therapyMolecular pathogenesisApproval of midostaurinPathophysiology of AMLMeasurable residual diseaseAdvanced clinical testingClinical trial developmentAcute myeloid leukemiaCell surface antigensDevelopment of agentsDisease relapseImmune environmentAML treatmentResidual diseaseTherapeutic armamentariumMyeloid leukemiaNovel therapiesSurface antigenClinical testingTrial developmentTherapyAMLEscape mechanismsGene mutationsRelapse
2020
Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey
Pine AB, Chokr N, Stahl M, Steensma DP, Sekeres MA, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Stone RM, Greenberg PL, Bejar R, Bewersdorf JP, Gore SD, Zeidan AM. Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2020, 61: 1455-1464. PMID: 32026740, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1723013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationMolecular profilingNext-generation sequencingWeb-based surveyRole of NGSManagement of patientsUtility of NGSEvidence-based guidelinesHealth care providersLarge web-based surveyMDS patientsPractice patternsTreatment decisionsCare providersResponse assessmentProviders' beliefsPatientsInstitutional guidelinesGene mutationsDiagnosisSyndromeTesting logisticsInterpretation of resultsWide variation