2018
Improving the prognosis of patients with severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (CKD G4+): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference
Eckardt K, Bansal N, Coresh J, Evans M, Grams M, Herzog C, James M, Heerspink H, Pollock C, Stevens P, Tamura M, Tonelli M, Wheeler D, Winkelmayer W, Cheung M, Hemmelgarn B, Participants C, Abu-Alfa A, Anand S, Arici M, Ballew S, Block G, Burgos-Calderon R, Charytan D, Das-Gupta Z, Dwyer J, Fliser D, Froissart M, Gill J, Griffith K, Harris D, Huffman K, Inker L, Jager K, Jun M, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kasiske B, Kovesdy C, Krane V, Lamb E, Lerma E, Levey A, Levin A, Mauro J, Nash D, Navaneethan S, O’Donoghue D, Obrador G, Pecoits-Filho R, Robinson B, Schäffner E, Segev D, Stengel B, Stenvinkel P, Tangri N, Tentori F, Tsukamoto Y, Turakhia M, Vazquez M, Wang A, Williams A. Improving the prognosis of patients with severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (CKD G4+): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney International 2018, 93: 1281-1292. PMID: 29656903, PMCID: PMC5998808, DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.006.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsGlomerular filtration rateKidney replacement therapyCKD G4Kidney failureFiltration rateRisk factorsGlobal outcomeTraditional CVD risk factorsCKD Prognosis ConsortiumCVD risk factorsCardiovascular disease eventsPrognosis of patientsOptimal therapeutic strategyControversies ConferenceCohort studyCVD outcomesHeart failureVariable prognosisClinical outcomesTherapeutic challengeKidney diseasePrognostic valueReplacement therapyInternational expert groupPatient preferences
2004
Superiority of Icodextrin Compared with 4.25% Dextrose for Peritoneal Ultrafiltration
Finkelstein F, Healy H, Abu-Alfa A, Ahmad S, Brown F, Gehr T, Nash K, Sorkin M, Mujais S, Group O. Superiority of Icodextrin Compared with 4.25% Dextrose for Peritoneal Ultrafiltration. Journal Of The American Society Of Nephrology 2004, 16: 546-554. PMID: 15625070, DOI: 10.1681/asn.2004090793.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIcodextrin groupNegative net ultrafiltrationNet ultrafiltrationPeritoneal ultrafiltrationWeek 2Week 1Control groupDouble-blind trialPercentage of patientsAutomated Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal dialysisTreatment groupsControlled EvaluationHigh transportersClinical observationsIcodextrinStudy periodBaselineLong dwellPatientsDextroseSolute removalGroupEfficiency ratioMulticenter