2022
Angiographic Lesion Discordance in Women Presenting With Ischemic Heart Disease: Comparison of Visual Assessment, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, and Quantitative Flow Ratio.
Gitto M, Saito Y, Taoutel R, Schneider MD, Papoutsidakis N, Ardito S, Henry G, Cristea E, Lansky AJ, Altin SE. Angiographic Lesion Discordance in Women Presenting With Ischemic Heart Disease: Comparison of Visual Assessment, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Journal Of Invasive Cardiology 2022, 34: e202-e209. PMID: 35089162, DOI: 10.25270/jic/21.00146.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuantitative coronary angiographyIschemic heart diseaseQuantitative flow ratioStress perfusion imagingDiameter stenosisCoronary angiographyIschemic symptomsCoronary revascularizationHeart diseasePerfusion imagingStenosis severityIndependent core laboratoryCohort of womenVisual assessmentCoronary stenosis severityConsecutive patientsAngiographic severityCoronary stenosisLesion assessmentClinical practiceCore laboratoryLesionsAngiographyWomenBlinded operators
2020
TCT CONNECT-208 Accuracy of Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Visual Assessment for Predicting Functionally Significant Stenoses in Women With Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Gitto M, Taoutel R, Schneider M, Papoutsidakis N, Ardito S, Cristea E, Lansky A, Altin S. TCT CONNECT-208 Accuracy of Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Visual Assessment for Predicting Functionally Significant Stenoses in Women With Chronic Coronary Syndrome. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2020, 76: b88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.223.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Comparison of Clinical Interpretation With Visual Assessment and Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary Practice
Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, Lansky AJ, Cohen DJ, Jones PG, Kureshi F, Dehmer GJ, Drozda JP, Walsh MN, Brush JE, Koenig GC, Waites TF, Gantt DS, Kichura G, Chazal RA, O’Brien P, Valentine CM, Rumsfeld JS, Reiber JH, Elmore JG, Krumholz RA, Weaver WD, Krumholz HM. Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Comparison of Clinical Interpretation With Visual Assessment and Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary Practice. Circulation 2013, 128: e463-e464. PMID: 24344070, PMCID: PMC8698215, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.005507.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComparison of Clinical Interpretation With Visual Assessment and Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary Practice
Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, Lansky AJ, Cohen DJ, Jones PG, Kureshi F, Dehmer GJ, Drozda JP, Walsh MN, Brush JE, Koenig GC, Waites TF, Gantt DS, Kichura G, Chazal RA, O’Brien P, Valentine CM, Rumsfeld JS, Reiber JH, Elmore JG, Krumholz RA, Weaver WD, Krumholz HM. Comparison of Clinical Interpretation With Visual Assessment and Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary Practice. Circulation 2013, 127: 1793-1800. PMID: 23470859, PMCID: PMC3908681, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.001952.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuantitative coronary angiographyPercent diameter stenosisPercutaneous coronary interventionDiameter stenosisCoronary interventionCoronary angiographyCoronary lesionsClinical interpretationAngiographic interpretationStenosis severityHigher percent diameter stenosisMedian percent diameter stenosisElective percutaneous coronary interventionMean differenceCoronary stenosis severityIntermediate lesionsUS hospitalsStenosisLesionsAngiographyPatientsInterventionSeverityVisual assessmentSuch findings