2024
Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Talanas G, Laconi A, Kereiakes D, Merella P, Reardon M, Spano A, Petretto G, Lauriola F, Casula M, Micheluzzi V, Isgender M, Chatzizisis Y, Farkouh M, Lansky A, Piazza N, Portoghese M, Casu G, Navarese E. Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2024, 3: 102143. PMID: 39131994, PMCID: PMC11307397, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102143.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementLong-term outcomesMeta-analysis of randomized trialsSevere aortic stenosisValve replacementValve thrombosisPacemaker implantationValve gradientAortic stenosisParavalvular leakFollow-upStroke riskRandomized trialsLong-term outcomes of patientsBalloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacementSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementSafety of transcatheter aortic valve replacementRisk of transcatheter aortic valve replacementRisk of pacemaker implantationSecondary end pointsSurgical risk profileOutcomes of patientsMeta-analysis
2023
TCT-641 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. TCT-641 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 82: b258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.652.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEffects of Elective Coronary Revascularization vs Medical Therapy Alone on Noncardiac Mortality A Meta-Analysis
Navarese E, Lansky A, Farkouh M, Grzelakowska K, Bonaca M, Gorog D, Raggi P, Kelm M, Yeo B, Umińska J, Curzen N, Kubica J, Wijns W, Kereiakes D. Effects of Elective Coronary Revascularization vs Medical Therapy Alone on Noncardiac Mortality A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: 1144-1156. PMID: 37225285, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChronic coronary syndromeElective coronary revascularizationNoncardiac mortalityMedical therapyCoronary revascularizationTrial sequential analysisCumulative Z-curveRate ratioA Meta-AnalysisRandom-effects modelMeta-analysis findingsCoronary syndromeISCHEMIA trialRandomized trialsTrial evidenceRevascularizationTreatment groupsPrespecified endpointsMeta-AnalysisPatientsMortalityFutility boundariesDeath rateTrialsTreatment effects
2019
Clinical outcomes of complex lesions treated with an abluminal groove‐filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus‐eluting stent
Saito Y, Baumbach A, Wijns W, Xu B, Kelbæk H, Zheng M, Morel M, Anderson R, Schächinger V, Lansky A, Investigators T. Clinical outcomes of complex lesions treated with an abluminal groove‐filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus‐eluting stent. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 96: 1023-1028. PMID: 31769161, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28609.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk patientsClinical outcomesComer studyI trialDurable polymer everolimus-eluting stentsTarget vessel myocardial infarctionSirolimus-eluting coronary stentYear clinical outcomesTarget lesion failureVessel myocardial infarctionLow-risk patientsWorse clinical outcomesEverolimus-eluting stentsHigh-risk groupLow-risk groupStrict eligibility criteriaFIREHAWK stentLesion failurePrimary endpointRandomized trialsMyocardial infarctionRisk groupsInclusion criteriaComplex lesionsXIENCE stent
2014
Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR) – systematic review and meta-analysis
Fröhlich GM, Lansky AJ, Webb J, Roffi M, Toggweiler S, Reinthaler M, Wang D, Hutchinson N, Wendler O, Hildick-Smith D, Meier P. Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR) – systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine 2014, 12: 41. PMID: 24612945, PMCID: PMC4022332, DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-41.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsShorter hospital stayGeneral anesthesiaHospital stayRelative riskProcedure timeSevere aortic valve stenosisTranscatheter aortic valve implantationResultsSeven observational studiesAcute kidney injuryProcedure-related mortalityPooled relative riskAortic valve implantationAortic valve stenosisShort-term outcomesShorter procedure timeRandom-effects modelKidney injuryValve implantationOverall mortalityValve stenosisRandomized trialsTransfemoral TAVRLocal anesthesiaTreatment optionsMyocardial infarctionShort and long-term safety and efficacy of polymer-free vs. durable polymer drug-eluting stents. A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials including 6178 patients
Navarese EP, Kowalewski M, Cortese B, Kandzari D, Dias S, Wojakowski W, Buffon A, Lansky A, Angelini P, Torguson R, Kubica J, Kelm M, de Boer MJ, Waksman R, Suryapranata H. Short and long-term safety and efficacy of polymer-free vs. durable polymer drug-eluting stents. A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials including 6178 patients. Atherosclerosis 2014, 233: 224-231. PMID: 24529148, DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDurable polymer drug-eluting stentsDrug-eluting stentsStent thrombosisPolymer-free drug-eluting stentsRandomized trialsMyocardial infarctionMain efficacy endpointLong-term safetyLesion revascularizationEfficacy endpointSafety endpointVessel revascularizationMI ratesLong followCochrane DatabaseSafety profileClinical practiceRCTsGoogle ScholarConflicting resultsRevascularizationSignificant differencesEfficacyPatientsEndpoint
2012
TCT-584 Nine Month Imaging and Twelve Month Clinical Results from the DESSOLVE II Randomized Trial of the MiStent® SES with Absorbable Polymer
Wijns W, Vrolix M, Verheye S, Schoors D, Slagboom T, Gosselink M, Benit E, Desmet W, Chowdhary S, Lansky A, Bezerra H, Fitzgerald P, Kandzari D, Ormiston J. TCT-584 Nine Month Imaging and Twelve Month Clinical Results from the DESSOLVE II Randomized Trial of the MiStent® SES with Absorbable Polymer. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2012, 60: b169-b170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.619.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
COMPARISON OF EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING AND PACLITAXEL-ELUTING CORONARY STENTS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING MULTI-VESSEL STENTING: POOLED ANALYSIS FROM THE SPIRIT III AND SPIRIT IV RANDOMIZED TRIALS
Kereiakes D, Sudhir K, Hermiller J, Lansky A, Doostzadeh J, Pierson W, Su X, Gordon P, Stone G. COMPARISON OF EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING AND PACLITAXEL-ELUTING CORONARY STENTS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING MULTI-VESSEL STENTING: POOLED ANALYSIS FROM THE SPIRIT III AND SPIRIT IV RANDOMIZED TRIALS. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 55: a140.e1317. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)61318-6.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2009
5-Year Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Insights From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Bare-Metal Stents
Caixeta A, Leon MB, Lansky AJ, Nikolsky E, Aoki J, Moses JW, Schofer J, Morice MC, Schampaert E, Kirtane AJ, Popma JJ, Parise H, Fahy M, Mehran R. 5-Year Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Insights From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Bare-Metal Stents. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2009, 54: 894-902. PMID: 19712798, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBare metal stentsTarget vessel revascularizationStent thrombosisRate of deathMyocardial infarctionVessel revascularizationPooled analysisAcademic Research Consortium definitionsPatient-level pooled analysisDrug-eluting stent implantationArterial healing responseComposite of deathProbable stent thrombosisLong-term safetyDrug-eluting stentsLate stent thrombosisClinical outcomesRandomized trialsStent implantationSuperior efficacyBMS groupThrombosisHealing responseSES groupStents
2008
Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Results from the CADILLAC trial
Lansky AJ, Tsuchiya Y, Brener M, Mehran R, Cristea E, Pietras C, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Leon MB, Moses J, Stone GW. Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Results from the CADILLAC trial. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2008, 72: 917-924. PMID: 19016469, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21714.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbciximabAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalAspirinClopidogrelCoronary AngiographyDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFemaleHemorrhageHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentStentsThrombosisTiclopidineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionPrimary stentingCADILLAC trialRecurrent ischemiaSevere bleedingMyocardial infarctionEfficacy of clopidogrelMore recurrent ischemiaTIMI 0/1 flowSimilar clinical outcomesTiclopidine treatmentAngiographic characteristicsClopidogrel useIndependent predictorsClinical outcomesMultivariable analysisRandomized trialsStent thrombosisStent implantationOperator's discretionClopidogrelStentingPatientsTiclopidineRelative safety
2005
Two-year clinical follow-up of 90Sr/90 Y β-radiation versus placebo control for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
Silber S, Popma JJ, Suntharalingam M, Lansky AJ, Heuser RR, Speiser B, Teirstein PS, Bass T, O'Neill W, Lasala J, Reisman M, Sharma SK, Kuntz RE, Bonan R, Investigators F. Two-year clinical follow-up of 90Sr/90 Y β-radiation versus placebo control for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. American Heart Journal 2005, 149: 689-694. PMID: 15990754, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.061.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAnticoagulantsBeta ParticlesBrachytherapyCoronary AngiographyCoronary DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDiabetes ComplicationsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLife TablesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStentsStrontium RadioisotopesThrombophiliaTreatment OutcomeYttrium RadioisotopesConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsTarget vessel revascularizationStent restenosisIntracoronary brachytherapyOriginal patientsPrimary safety end pointTwo-year clinical outcomesPlacebo-controlled randomized trialEnd pointAdverse cardiac eventsPlacebo-controlled studyPrimary end pointSafety end pointKaplan-Meier analysisInitial beneficial effectsRestenosis TrialVessel revascularizationCardiac eventsPlacebo armClinical followActive treatmentClinical outcomesRandomized trialsPlacebo controlPatients
2000
Randomized Trial of Contrast Media Utilization in High-Risk PTCA
Davidson C, Laskey W, Hermiller J, Harrison J, Matthai W, Vlietstra R, Brinker J, Kereiakes D, Muhlestein J, Lansky A, Popma J, Buchbinder M, Hirshfeld J. Randomized Trial of Contrast Media Utilization in High-Risk PTCA. Circulation 2000, 101: 2172-2177. PMID: 10801758, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.18.2172.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse clinical eventsHospital major adverse clinical eventsPrimary end pointClinical eventsNonionic dimer iodixanolDimer iodixanolEnd pointLow-osmolar contrast agentsHigh-risk PTCAHospital clinical eventsThrombus-related eventsTotal clinical eventsDouble-blind trialAcute coronary syndromeHigh-risk patientsProspective multicenter trialAdverse clinical eventsCoronary artery interventionPTCA outcomeAngiographic successCoronary syndromeNovo lesionsArtery interventionMulticenter trialRandomized trials