2024
Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?
Fezzi S, Ding D, Mahfoud F, Huang J, Lansky A, Tu S, Wijns W. Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention? Nature Reviews Cardiology 2024, 21: 652-662. PMID: 38710772, DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01014-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionOptimal revascularizationRisk of periprocedural myocardial infarctionCoronary interventionMyocardial infarctionStent-related eventsEfficacy of percutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery diseasePeriprocedural myocardial infarctionAcute myocardial infarctionReperfusion of acute myocardial infarctionClinical successRevascularization outcomesArtery diseaseIncreased riskAngiographic guidancePercutaneous revascularizationRevascularizationPatientsIntracoronary imagingLincoffDiagnostic toolPhysiological assessment
2010
Side branch occlusion with everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT III randomised trial.
Lansky AJ, Yaqub M, Hermiller JB, Smith RS, Farhat N, Caputo R, Williams JE, Sanz M, Koo K, Sood P, Sudhir K, Stone GW. Side branch occlusion with everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT III randomised trial. EuroIntervention 2010, 6 Suppl J: j44-52. PMID: 21930490, DOI: 10.4244/eijv6supja8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiovascular AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsPeriprocedural myocardial infarctionSide branch occlusionBranch occlusionMyocardial infarctionStent placementDrug-eluting stent placementIndependent angiographic core laboratoryPaclitaxel-eluting stent placementLong-term adverse outcomesSPIRIT III trialPaclitaxel-eluting stentsAngiographic core laboratoryThree-year resultsLower ratesSide branchesEES armIII trialsMI ratesIndependent predictorsClinical outcomesAdverse outcomesProcedural angiogramsGrade 0Stent typeCore laboratory
2009
Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Versus Spontaneously Occurring Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes An Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial
Prasad A, Gersh BJ, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, Moses JW, Ohman EM, White HD, Pocock SJ, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Versus Spontaneously Occurring Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes An Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2009, 54: 477-486. PMID: 19628125, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.063.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPeriprocedural myocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeSpontaneous myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionCoronary syndromeACUITY trialCoronary interventionPrognostic significanceSubsequent mortalitySegment elevation acute coronary syndromesElevation acute coronary syndromePowerful independent predictorIndependent prognostic significanceAtherosclerosis burdenIndependent predictorsMultivariable analysisUnadjusted ratesProcedural characteristicsBaseline riskClinical significancePatientsMortalitySyndromeSpontaneous development
2004
1155-78 Implications and prevention of large periprocedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein grafts and thrombotic native coronary lesions
Lasic Z, Mehran R, Nikolsky E, Negoita M, Costa R, Cox D, Babb J, Nukta D, Bilodeau L, Cannon L, Stuckey T, Hermiller J, Lansky A, Leon M, Stone G. 1155-78 Implications and prevention of large periprocedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein grafts and thrombotic native coronary lesions. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2004, 43: a88. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(04)90367-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDiseased saphenous vein graftsNative coronary lesionsPeriprocedural myocardial infarctionSaphenous vein grafts
2001
Differential Impact on Survival of Electrocardiographic Q-Wave Versus Enzymatic Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Intervention
Stone G, Mehran R, Dangas G, Lansky A, Kornowski R, Leon M. Differential Impact on Survival of Electrocardiographic Q-Wave Versus Enzymatic Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Intervention. Circulation 2001, 104: 642-647. PMID: 11489768, DOI: 10.1161/hc3101.093902.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQ-wave myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous interventionCPK-MB elevationNon-Q-wave myocardial infarctionElective percutaneous interventionIndependent research nurseSerial creatine phosphokinasePeriprocedural myocardial infarctionTertiary referral centerRelative prognostic importanceNew Q wavesCPK-MB levelsPowerful independent determinantCPK-MB releaseEnzymatic elevationPeriprocedural infarctionReferral centerConsecutive patientsReferral populationResearch nursesIndependent determinantsPrognostic importanceStent useQ waves