2001
Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries
Baim D, Cutlip D, O’Shaughnessy C, Hermiller J, Kereiakes D, Giambartolomei A, Katz S, Lansky A, Fitzpatrick M, Popma J, Ho K, Leon M, Kuntz R, Investigators N. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2001, 87: 152-156. PMID: 11152830, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01307-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary end pointTarget vessel failureNIR stentPS stentBetter acute angiographic resultsTarget vessel failure rateMajor adverse cardiac eventsEnd pointSingle coronary lesionsAdverse cardiac eventsNative coronary arteriesNorth American trialsSuccessful stent deliveryAcute angiographic resultsPalmaz-Schatz stentsPrespecified cohortCardiac eventsAngiographic restudyAngiographic resultsCoronary lesionsPS patientsDiameter stenosisCoronary arteryVessel failureStent placementFinal results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries
Baim D, Cutlip D, Midei M, Linnemeier T, Schreiber T, Cox D, Kereiakes D, Popma J, Robertson L, Prince R, Lansky A, Ho K, Kuntz R, Investigators A. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2001, 87: 157-162. PMID: 11152831, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01308-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTarget vessel failurePS stentPalmaz-SchatzMajor adverse cardiac eventsNative vessel lesionsAdverse cardiac eventsPrimary end pointNative coronary arteriesSuccessful stent deliveryPalmaz-Schatz stentsAngiographic outcomesCardiac eventsAngiographic restudyAcute resultsDiameter stenosisVessel lesionsCoronary arteryVessel failureClinical equivalenceStent deliveryNonsignificant trendPatientsExcellent deliverabilityEnd pointStents
2000
The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz-Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions
Holmes D, Lansky A, Kuntz R, Bell M, Buchbinder M, Fortuna R, O’Shaughnessy C, Popma J, Investigators F. The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz-Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2000, 86: 1073-1079. PMID: 11074202, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01162-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStent minimal lumen diameterTarget vessel failureMinimal lumen diameterAngiographic restenosisPalmaz-SchatzLumen diameterPS stentEnd pointSignificant differencesAverage stent lengthBinary angiographic restenosisInfrequent adverse eventsPrimary end pointSecondary end pointsSmaller reference vesselsCoronary arterial lesionsNative coronary lesionsPrior bypass surgeryLong-term outcomesPalmaz-Schatz stentsPrior restenosisLesion revascularizationPercutaneous revascularizationBypass surgeryClinical restenosisRandomized Comparison of GR-II Stent and Palmaz-Schatz Stent for Elective Treatment of Coronary Stenoses
Lansky A, Roubin G, O’Shaughnessy C, Moore P, Dean L, Raizner A, Safian R, Zidar J, Kerr J, Popma J, Mehran R, Kuntz R, Leon M. Randomized Comparison of GR-II Stent and Palmaz-Schatz Stent for Elective Treatment of Coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2000, 102: 1364-1368. PMID: 10993853, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.12.1364.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary stenosisPalmaz-SchatzElective treatmentDe novo native coronary stenosisStent minimal lumen diameterMultivariate logistic regression analysisPrimary end pointTarget lesion revascularizationFree survival rateStent thrombosis ratesLong-term followNative coronary stenosisMinimal lumen diameterLogistic regression analysisPalmaz-Schatz stentsBalloon angioplasty proceduresRestenosis frequencyAngiographic restenosisLesion revascularizationProspective multicenterTLR rateFree survivalAcute treatmentConsecutive patientsDiabetes mellitusComparison of debulking followed by stenting versus stenting alone for saphenous vein graft aortoostial lesions: immediate and one-year clinical outcomes
Ahmed J, Hong M, Mehran R, Mintz G, Lansky A, Pichard A, Satler L, Kent K, Wu H, Stone G, Leon M. Comparison of debulking followed by stenting versus stenting alone for saphenous vein graft aortoostial lesions: immediate and one-year clinical outcomes. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2000, 35: 1560-1568. PMID: 10807461, DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00592-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOne-year clinical outcomesLumen cross-sectional areaLate clinical outcomesClinical outcomesStent implantationProcedural successRestenotic lesionsIntravascular ultrasoundCross-sectional areaOverall cardiac event-free survivalCardiac event-free survivalLate cardiac eventsEvent-free survivalOverall procedural successCox regression analysisComplex lesion subsetsPalmaz-Schatz stentsLesion revascularizationCardiac eventsMost patientsConsecutive patientsIndependent predictorsProcedural complicationsLesion subsetsMyocardial infarction