2022
Development and validation of an automated algorithm for end point adjudication for a large U.S. national registry
Friedman DJ, Pierre D, Wang Y, Gambone L, Koutras C, Segawa C, Farb A, Vemulapalli S, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Lansky A, Curtis JP, Freeman JV. Development and validation of an automated algorithm for end point adjudication for a large U.S. national registry. American Heart Journal 2022, 254: 102-111. PMID: 36007567, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEnd point adjudicationCEC adjudicationEnd pointLarge registriesClinical trialsNational Cardiovascular Data RegistryMajor vascular complicationsU.S. National RegistryPost-discharge eventsAgreement rateMajor bleedingNeurologic eventsVascular complicationsNational registryEvent adjudicationData registryRegistryCommittee's evaluationsPercent agreementGold standardAgreement thresholdHospitalTrialsFurther confirmationBleeding
2020
Does the operator's sex matter? An analysis based on the national interventional cardiology registry.
Lanocha M, Lansky A, Siudak Z, Włodarczak A, Tarchalski J, Malinowski KP, Laskowski W, Sikora T, Radziszewska E, Dolecka-Ślusarczyk M, Wojakowski W, Bartuś S, Grygier M, Tokarek T, Dudek D, Lesiak M. Does the operator's sex matter? An analysis based on the national interventional cardiology registry. Kardiologia Polska 2020, 78: 1221-1226. PMID: 33146499, DOI: 10.33963/kp.15665.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionPractice patternsOutcomes of PCIInterventional cardiologyInterventional Cardiology RegistryCardiovascular risk factorsAcute coronary syndromeSingle-vessel diseaseCoronary artery interventionInvasive cardiology proceduresSex matterMale operatorsCardiology RegistryCoronary syndromeCoronary interventionArtery interventionMore patientsClinical outcomesMain indicationsNational registryRisk factorsMedian numberContrast dosesLow prevalenceHigh doses