2021
TCT-101 Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery: Multicenter LM-DRAGON Registry
Wańha W, Bil J, Kołodziejczak M, Kowalowka A, Hudziak D, Gocol R, Kowalewski M, Januszek R, Figatowski T, Milewski M, Tomasiewicz B, Kubler P, Desperak P, Kuźma Ł, Milewski K, Gora B, Los A, Kulczycki J, Wlodarczak A, Grygier M, Lesiak M, Kleczynski P, Litwinowicz R, Borin A, Smolka G, Reczuch K, Gruchała M, Gil R, Jaguszewski M, Bartus K, Suwalski P, Dobrzycki S, Dudek D, Bartus S, Gasior M, Legutko J, Ochała A, Lansky A, Deja M, Kedhi E, Wojakowski W. TCT-101 Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery: Multicenter LM-DRAGON Registry. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2021, 78: b42-b43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.951.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2002
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) versus coronary artery stenting for elective revascularization of the left anterior descending artery
Iakovou I, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Stamou SC, Pfister AJ, Dullum MK, Leon MB, Corso PJ. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) versus coronary artery stenting for elective revascularization of the left anterior descending artery. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2002, 90: 885-887. PMID: 12372581, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02715-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiopulmonary BypassCause of DeathCoronary Artery BypassCoronary DiseaseCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInternal Mammary-Coronary Artery AnastomosisLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesStentsSurvival RateThoracotomy