2019
Predictive validity of conversion from the clinical high risk syndrome to frank psychosis
Yoviene Sykes LA, Ferrara M, Addington J, Bearden CE, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt BA, Perkins DO, Mathalon DH, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, Walker EF, McGlashan TH, Woodberry KA, Powers AR, Ponce AN, Cahill JD, Pollard JM, Srihari VH, Woods SW. Predictive validity of conversion from the clinical high risk syndrome to frank psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 2019, 216: 184-191. PMID: 31864837, PMCID: PMC7239715, DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFrank psychosisFirst-episode psychosis patientsOne-yearNorth American Prodromal Longitudinal StudySeverity of illnessClinical high-risk syndromeCurrent antipsychotic medicationsHigh-risk syndromePsychosis risk syndromeClinical high riskPredictive validityFEP casesPrescription ratesAntipsychotic medicationPsychosis patientsRisk syndromePsychosis onsetHigh riskLittle investigative attentionDiagnostic stabilityCHR individualsPsychosis paradigmPsychosisLongitudinal studySyndromeDuration of the psychosis prodrome
Powers AR, Addington J, Perkins DO, Bearden CE, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt BA, Mathalon DH, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, Walker EF, McGlashan TH, Woods SW. Duration of the psychosis prodrome. Schizophrenia Research 2019, 216: 443-449. PMID: 31806523, PMCID: PMC7539292, DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSyndrome onsetPsychosis prodromeNorth American Prodrome Longitudinal StudyCHR-P patientsClinical high-risk syndromeHigh-risk syndromePsychosis risk syndromeMedication exposureProdromal periodFrank psychosisRisk syndromeProdromePsychosisLongitudinal studySyndromeOnsetStructured interviewsDurationFirst descriptionThirdYearsFinal thirdPatientsMonthsReliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS)
Woods S, Walsh B, Powers A, McGlashan T. Reliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS). 2019, 85-113. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17336-4_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPsychosis risk syndromePsychosis risk symptomsClinical high-risk syndromeHigh-risk syndromeStructured interviewsInter-rater reliabilityCHR casesSeverity ScaleSIPS diagnosesEpidemiology studiesTotal scoreSyndromeSymptom subtypesCHR sampleFavorable psychometric propertiesSymptomsPsychometric propertiesDiagnostic instrumentDiscriminant validityMedian inter-rater reliabilityGeneral itemsEpidemiologyPrevalencePsychosisSubtypes
2017
Lack of Diagnostic Pluripotentiality in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Specificity of Comorbidity Persistence and Search for Pluripotential Subgroups
Woods SW, Powers AR, Taylor JH, Davidson CA, Johannesen JK, Addington J, Perkins DO, Bearden CE, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt BA, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, Walker EF, McGlashan TH. Lack of Diagnostic Pluripotentiality in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Specificity of Comorbidity Persistence and Search for Pluripotential Subgroups. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2017, 44: 254-263. PMID: 29036402, PMCID: PMC5814797, DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbx138.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCHR syndromeDiagnostic outcomesCHR subgroupsClinical high-risk syndromeHigh-risk syndromeOnset of psychosisClinical high riskPersistence of anxietyEmergent psychosisCHR patientsRisk syndromeObservational studyCHR casesHigh riskNonpsychotic disordersComorbid disordersComparison subjectsBipolar disorderDiagnostic InterviewSyndromeDSM-IVPatientsPsychosisDiagnostic specificityComparison group