2024
A retrospective analysis of factors associated with deep contraceptive implant removals compared to superficial removals
Kendall P, Bresnitz W, Huang J, Sheeder J, Lazorwitz A. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with deep contraceptive implant removals compared to superficial removals. Contraception 2024, 137: 110486. PMID: 38754757, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110486.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContraceptive implant removalLower body mass indexBody mass indexImplant removalSuperficial removalWeight gainAssociated with younger ageRetrospective cohort studyMann-Whitney U testMultivariate logistic regressionAssociated with increased oddsFactors associated with increased likelihoodHealth record reviewContraceptive implantsImplant exchangeFischer's exactElectronic health record reviewImplant useComparing patientsRetrospective analysisMass indexCohort studyPatient characteristicsRemoval groupInserting contraceptive implants
2020
An exploratory analysis on the influence of genetic variants on weight gain among etonogestrel contraceptive implant users
Lazorwitz A, Dindinger E, Harrison M, Aquilante C, Sheeder J, Teal S. An exploratory analysis on the influence of genetic variants on weight gain among etonogestrel contraceptive implant users. Contraception 2020, 102: 180-185. PMID: 32407811, PMCID: PMC7483263, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBody mass indexEtonogestrel contraceptive implant usersEstrogen receptor 1Contraceptive implant usersContraceptive implant useWeight gainImplant useWeight changeImplant insertionEnrollment body mass indexMedian body mass indexGenetic variantsReproductive-aged womenMedian weight changeImplant usersExogenous steroid hormonesEstrogen receptor 1 geneReceptor 1 genePhysiologic plausibilityEtonogestrel implantsMetabolic syndromeMedical recordsContraceptive counselingRetrospective analysisIndividualized counseling