Skip to Main Content
Q+A

Changing the Landscape of Carotid Artery Disease Treatment

A Q&A With Carlos Mena, MD, professor of medicine (cardiovascular medicine)

4 Minute Read

More than 3% of older adults in the United States have been diagnosed with carotid artery disease, a condition where the coronary arteries narrow due to fatty deposits or plaque buildup. Carotid artery disease is one of the major risk factors for stroke.

Carlos Mena, MD, professor of medicine (cardiovascular medicine), is the site principal investigator for CREST-2, a multi-center, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored, international randomized clinical trial. The trial aims to compare different methods of stroke prevention to determine the safest and most effective treatment options for individuals with carotid artery disease.

In the following Q&A, Mena discusses his work in the clinical trial and shares new findings that could potentially change the landscape for treating the disease.

Carlos Mena, MD

What motivated you to become a site principal investigator for the CREST-2 clinical trial?

For decades, the medical community has deliberated what the right treatment is—or even if treatment is necessary—for patients with carotid artery disease, who don't have symptoms. Current treatment options include intensive medical management, either alone or in combination with revascularization. Revascularization includes procedures such as carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy, a surgical procedure that removes plaque buildup in the carotid artery.

The CREST-2 trial is the first comprehensive trial to compare treatment differences between current medical management therapies and revascularization. The trial presents an opportunity for the medical community to reach a consensus on the most effective treatment for patients.

Yale was one of the top enrollers in the CREST-2 trial. How did you recruit people to participate?

All participating centers faced challenges in enrolling and randomizing patients into different study arms. Many individuals with carotid artery disease feel fine and are reluctant to undergo invasive revascularization therapies. On the other hand, other patients strongly preferred revascularization over medical management alone.

Our success was a result of contributions from our entire team. We all recognized the importance of this trial, so each team member took the time to explain the details to patients, schedule multiple follow-up visits, and answer any questions they had. I’m particularly thankful to the Yale Vascular Surgery team, as well as Shannon Lynch, FNP, Amanda Pappas, RN, Dawn Shaddinger, RN, and our entire administrative staff, nurse practitioners, clinical fellows, and research coordinators. I am also grateful to Drs. Eric Velazquez and Alexandra Lansky, who supported our work throughout the trial.

Most of all, I am thankful to all the patients who participated in this trial. Their involvement is helping us learn how to prevent strokes and improve care for millions of people worldwide. This kind of scientific research would not be possible without them.

What have we learned from the trial about treating carotid artery disease?

For the first time, we have clear evidence that certain treatments can help prevent strokes, and some forms of treatment are more beneficial than others.

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published initial results from the trial, which showed that contemporary medical therapy significantly decreases the likelihood of having a stroke. The study also showed that revascularization procedures performed by an experienced operator, in combination with medical therapy, could further lower that risk.

These initial results will help change the landscape of carotid artery disease treatment and stroke prevention.

What research questions remain?

Now that we have evidence suggesting that treatment may lower the risk of stroke, should we increase screening for carotid artery disease? We do not yet have research to show that increased screening is appropriate, but further research is needed to help clarify this for the medical community.

I am also the site PI for CREST-H, a subgroup of the CREST-2 clinical trial. In this study, we are examining whether stent placements or endarterectomies can help improve cognitive function. Because carotid artery disease can restrict blood flow to the brain, some individuals with the condition may experience vascular cognitive impairment, which affects their ability to remember information or think clearly. For many patients, preventing or addressing cognitive loss is a priority for their care. I hope that through our research, we can determine whether treatments can improve cognitive function.

Cardiovascular Medicine, one of 10 sections in the Yale Department of Internal Medicine, is dedicated to improving cardiovascular health by advancing groundbreaking research, training the next generation of experts in cardiology, and delivering world-class patient care to people with a range of cardiovascular issues. To learn more, visit Cardiovascular Medicine.

Article outro

The research reported in this news article was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (awards US01NS080168 and U01NS080165); the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Yale University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, CMS, HHS, or other funders.

Tags

Media Contact

For media inquiries, please contact us.

Learn more about the Yale Department of Internal Medicine.

Visit the website.

Explore More

Featured in this article

Related News