Response to Dobie et al. Letter, ‘Exchange Rate and Risk of Noise-induced Hearing Loss in Construction Workers’
Roberts B, Seixas N, Mukherjee B, Neitzel R. Response to Dobie et al. Letter, ‘Exchange Rate and Risk of Noise-induced Hearing Loss in Construction Workers’. Annals Of Work Exposures And Health 2018, 62: 1179-1181. PMID: 30346476, DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy085.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsConstruction workersRisk of noise-induced hearing lossNoise-induced hearing lossExchange rateHearing lossEvaluating the Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Different Noise Measurement Criteria
Roberts B, Seixas N, Mukherjee B, Neitzel R. Evaluating the Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Different Noise Measurement Criteria. Annals Of Work Exposures And Health 2018, 62: 295-306. PMID: 29415217, DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHearing threshold levelsHearing outcomesHearing lossOccupational Safety and Health AdministrationRisk of noise-induced hearing lossHealth AdministrationNoise exposureOccupational Safety and HealthNoise-induced hearing lossInstitute of Occupational Safety and HealthSafety and HealthNational Institute of Occupational Safety and HealthCohort of construction workersMixed modelsDuration of participationAssessment of noise exposureMeasures of exposureHearing levelAkaike’s information criterion differencesConstruction workersAverage noise levelLinear mixed modelsLAVGContinuous averagingOSHA