The PCL–R and Capital Sentencing: A Commentary on “Death Is Different”
Hare R, Olver M, Stockdale K, Neumann C, Mokros A, Baskin-Sommers A, Brand E, Folino J, Gacono C, Gray N, Kiehl K, Knight R, Leon-Mayer E, Logan M, Meloy J, Roy S, Salekin R, Snowden R, Thomson N, Tillem S, Vitacco M, Yoon D. The PCL–R and Capital Sentencing: A Commentary on “Death Is Different”. Psychology Public Policy And Law 2020, 26: 519-522. DOI: 10.1037/law0000290.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the Assessment of Risk for Institutional Violence: A Cautionary Note on )
Olver M, Stockdale K, Neumann C, Hare R, Mokros A, Baskin-Sommers A, Brand E, Folino J, Gacono C, Gray N, Kiehl K, Knight R, Leon-Mayer E, Logan M, Meloy J, Roy S, Salekin R, Snowden R, Thomson N, Tillem S, Vitacco M, Yoon D. Reliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the Assessment of Risk for Institutional Violence: A Cautionary Note on ). Psychology Public Policy And Law 2020, 26: 490-510. DOI: 10.1037/law0000256.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInstitutional violenceCapital sentencing decisionsStatements of concernSentencing issuesNew empirical findingsSentencing decisionsViolencePsychopathy ChecklistViolence risk assessmentSingle case assessmentEmpirical findingsHare Psychopathy ChecklistForensic assessmentLiterature reviewGroup dataPoor predictive validityArgumentIssuesCautionary noteRating issuesCapitalAcademicsRed herringOpinionImportant issue
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply