2019
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
Paul R, Huysman B, Maddipati R, Madden T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2019, 222: s884.e1-s884.e9. PMID: 31838124, PMCID: PMC7781163, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanChoice BehaviorContraceptive Agents, HormonalContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMarital StatusMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecognition, PsychologyWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsContraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceDepo-medroxyprogesteroneContraceptive choicesReversible contraceptionDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateHealth center populationHealthcare provider visitsHormonal intrauterine deviceHigh acceptabilityMultivariable Poisson regressionQualified health centersPreference-sensitive decisionsReversible contraception methodsCopper intrauterine deviceInterviewer-administered surveySpecific contraceptive methodsChi-square testProvider visitsContraceptive counselingContraceptive careHealth centersContraception methodsContraceptive methods
2018
Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis
Madden T, Barker A, Huntzberry K, Secura G, Peipert J, McBride T. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 219: 595.e1-595.e11. PMID: 30194049, PMCID: PMC6741429, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTitle X programContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCost savingsValue of investmentCost-savings analysisCHOICE ProjectFederal poverty lineUnintended pregnancyMissouri's Medicaid programPoverty lineContraceptive costsComparison groupPolicy interventionsHousehold incomeMedicaid savingsTotal cost savingsGroup costsX programEffective reversible contraceptive methodsProspective cohort studyReproductive-age womenIncomeReversible contraceptive methodsSubstantial cost savingsState of Missouri
2015
Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 349-353. PMID: 25825986, PMCID: PMC4441000, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsRepeat abortionProspective cohort studyTeen pregnancyReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectYears of ageNon-LARC methodsNon-LARC usersHealth care systemContraceptive method choiceWomen 14Cohort studyContraceptive counselingEffective contraceptionLARC usersContraceptive methodsPregnancyStudy participantsNational ratesGreater continuationCare systemAccess barriersThe role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making
Madden T, Secura G, Nease R, Politi M, Peipert J. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 46.e1-46.e6. PMID: 25644443, PMCID: PMC4485538, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Baseline Correlates of Inconsistent and Incorrect Condom Use Among Sexually Active Women in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Shih S, Kebodeaux C, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Peipert J. Baseline Correlates of Inconsistent and Incorrect Condom Use Among Sexually Active Women in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2011, 38: 1012-1019. PMID: 21992976, PMCID: PMC3192989, DOI: 10.1097/olq.0b013e318225f8c3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorCohort StudiesCondomsContraception BehaviorContraceptive DevicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsIncorrect condom useMore sex actsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCondom useActive womenInconsistent condom useCHOICE ProjectLow condom useSex actsCorrect condom useFuture STIsProspective cohortBaseline correlatesUnivariate analysisRelative riskUnintended pregnancyHigh riskPrevention strategiesPoisson regressionUnprotected actsYounger ageWomenFirst intercourseBaseline dataPregnancy
2010
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: Recruiting Women at Highest Risk for Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infection
Spain J, Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: Recruiting Women at Highest Risk for Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infection. Journal Of Women's Health 2010, 19: 2233-2238. PMID: 20831439, PMCID: PMC3003915, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2146.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorCohort StudiesContraceptionEarly Medical InterventionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterinstitutional RelationsMiddle AgedMissouriPatient SelectionPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesRisk-TakingSexually Transmitted DiseasesWomen's HealthConceptsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive CHOICE ProjectHigh riskNumber of womenProspective cohort studyHigh-risk womenCHOICE ProjectSignificant increaseLow-income womenCohort studyReversible contraceptionPregnancyGreater riskMethod satisfactionStrong community partnershipsWomenInfectionSTIsRecruitment strategiesRiskKey community partnersBaselineMinority participantsEnrollmentParticipants