2020
Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis
Schultheis P, Montoya M, Zhao Q, Archer J, Madden T, Peipert J. Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2020, 224: 228-229. PMID: 33049248, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetatePregnancyPregnancy, EctopicProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTransdermal Patch
2012
Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal Of Medicine 2012, 366: 1998-2007. PMID: 22621627, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1110855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsIntrauterine DevicesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsLarge prospective cohort studyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsProspective cohort studyContraceptive failure ratesReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionDMPA injectionOverall cohortCohort studyRate of failureContraceptive pillsContraceptive failurePregnancyYoung womenContraceptionPillsOlder participantsAgeFailure rateParticipantsRisk
2011
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Peipert J, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2011, 117: 1105-1113. PMID: 21508749, PMCID: PMC3548669, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31821188ad.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine DevicesKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTransdermal PatchYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceReversible contraception methodsContinuation ratesReversible contraceptionContraception methodsContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodReversible contraception usersProspective cohort studyHigh contraceptive efficacyMonths of enrollmentDepot medroxyprogesterone acetateLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectHigh rateSurvey time pointsCohort studyIntrauterine systemContraceptive pillsMedroxyprogesterone acetateOCP usersContraceptive efficacyHormonal methods
2010
Understanding prescription adherence: pharmacy claims data from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Pittman M, Secura G, Allsworth J, Homco J, Madden T, Peipert J. Understanding prescription adherence: pharmacy claims data from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2010, 83: 340-345. PMID: 21397092, PMCID: PMC3058146, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOral contraceptive pillsVaginal ringPharmacy dataRisk factorsMarker of adherenceRobust error varianceCox proportional hazardsHistory of abortionContraceptive CHOICE ProjectContraceptive prescriptionsEarly nonadherenceInitial nonadherenceMonthly refillsMultivariable analysisAdherence ratesContraceptive pillsPrescription adherenceUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsNonadherenceProportional hazardsPoisson regressionTransdermal patchWomenCHOICE Project