2021
Young women's preferences for contraceptive education: The importance of the clinician in three U.S. health centers in 2017-2018
Zeal C, Paul R, Dorsey M, Politi M, Madden T. Young women's preferences for contraceptive education: The importance of the clinician in three U.S. health centers in 2017-2018. Contraception 2021, 104: 553-555. PMID: 34139152, PMCID: PMC9118463, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.005.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
Paul R, Huysman B, Maddipati R, Madden T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2019, 222: s884.e1-s884.e9. PMID: 31838124, PMCID: PMC7781163, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanChoice BehaviorContraceptive Agents, HormonalContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMarital StatusMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecognition, PsychologyWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsContraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceDepo-medroxyprogesteroneContraceptive choicesReversible contraceptionDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateHealth center populationHealthcare provider visitsHormonal intrauterine deviceHigh acceptabilityMultivariable Poisson regressionQualified health centersPreference-sensitive decisionsReversible contraception methodsCopper intrauterine deviceInterviewer-administered surveySpecific contraceptive methodsChi-square testProvider visitsContraceptive counselingContraceptive careHealth centersContraception methodsContraceptive methodsImplementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol
Scalia P, Durand M, Forcino R, Schubbe D, Barr P, O’Brien N, O’Malley A, Foster T, Politi M, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Banks E, Madden T, Anchan R, Aarts J, Velentgas P, Balls-Berry J, Bacon C, Adams-Foster M, Mulligan C, Venable S, Cochran N, Elwyn G. Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol. Implementation Science 2019, 14: 88. PMID: 31477140, PMCID: PMC6721118, DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0933-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatient decision aidOption GridUterine fibroidsNormalization Process TheoryOutcome measuresMulti-component implementation strategyHeavy menstrual bleedingPrimary outcome measureMultiple treatment optionsYears of ageQuantitative outcome measuresBackgroundUterine fibroidsEligible patientsPelvic painPostmenopausal patientsPregnancy complicationsRecurrent symptomsDifferent time pointsMenstrual bleedingRoutine careTreatment optionsFemale sexStudy protocolClinician characteristicsTreatment decisionsComparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter careEffect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers
Buckel C, Maddipati R, Goodman M, Peipert J, Madden T. Effect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers. Contraception 2019, 99: 222-227. PMID: 30685287, PMCID: PMC6639006, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.12.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCounselingFemaleHumansLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationSame-day insertionContraceptive counselingProvider educationHealth centersUsual careEnhanced careReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionContraceptive methodsHealth center populationSame-day initiationQualified health centersRobust error varianceCommunity health centersContraceptive CHOICE ProjectProportion of womenUninsured womenLARC insertionProvider appointmentsRelative riskProvider practicesCare modelPoisson regressionVs. 13.7
2018
Ulipristal Acetate for Unscheduled Bleeding in Etonogestrel Implant Users
Zigler R, Madden T, Ashby C, Wan L, McNicholas C. Ulipristal Acetate for Unscheduled Bleeding in Etonogestrel Implant Users. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 132: 888-894. PMID: 30130351, PMCID: PMC6153077, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002810.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelFemaleHumansNorpregnadienesUterine HemorrhageYoung AdultConceptsEtonogestrel implant usersUlipristal acetateImplant usersIdentical-appearing placeboPlacebo-controlled trialSerum progesterone levelsUnscheduled bleedingBleeding profilePlacebo groupSecondary outcomesEnrolled participantsEligible participantsSerum progesteroneOvulatory potentialProgesterone levelsOvulation statusPlaceboU.S. FoodDemographic characteristicsWomenBleedingParticipant satisfactionEffect sizeDaysGroupMedicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis
Madden T, Barker A, Huntzberry K, Secura G, Peipert J, McBride T. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 219: 595.e1-595.e11. PMID: 30194049, PMCID: PMC6741429, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTitle X programContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCost savingsValue of investmentCost-savings analysisCHOICE ProjectFederal poverty lineUnintended pregnancyMissouri's Medicaid programPoverty lineContraceptive costsComparison groupPolicy interventionsHousehold incomeMedicaid savingsTotal cost savingsGroup costsX programEffective reversible contraceptive methodsProspective cohort studyReproductive-age womenIncomeReversible contraceptive methodsSubstantial cost savingsState of MissouriComparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial
Bernard C, Wan L, Peipert J, Madden T. Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial. Contraception 2018, 98: 223-227. PMID: 29778586, PMCID: PMC6129199, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRoutine care armPostpartum visitWeeks postpartumLARC initiationContraceptive initiationPostpartum initiationCare armRoutine careLARC usersImmediate postpartum womenInitiation of contraceptionReversible contraception initiationRoutine postpartum careStructured contraceptive counselingNon-blinded trialImmediate postpartum placementProportion of womenContraception initiationProspective randomizedIntervention armPostpartum carePostpartum placementPostpartum womenContraceptive counselingReversible contraception
2016
Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception
dos Santos P, Madden T, Omvig K, Peipert J. Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2016, 95: 382-389. PMID: 28041992, PMCID: PMC5376505, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsENG implant usersCopper IUD usersLNG-IUSBody compositionBody weightIUD usersCopper IUDImplant usersWeight gainProspective cohort studyLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemSubgroup of womenBody composition changesLean body massLNG-IUS usersCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectBody massCohort studyENG implantHealthy womenIntrauterine systemMean ageBlack raceInclusion criteriaAssociation of baseline bleeding pattern on amenorrhea with levonorgestrel intrauterine system use
Mejia M, McNicholas C, Madden T, Peipert J. Association of baseline bleeding pattern on amenorrhea with levonorgestrel intrauterine system use. Contraception 2016, 94: 556-560. PMID: 27364099, PMCID: PMC5077249, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLNG-IUS useEffect of baselineBleeding patternsMonths postinsertionLevonorgestrel intrauterine system useLikelihood of amenorrheaRates of amenorrheaHeavy menstrual bleedingHeavy menstrual flowMonths of enrollmentMultivariable logistic regressionIntrauterine system useIntrauterine system usersLNG-IUS usersContraceptive CHOICE ProjectMonths of useMenstrual bleedingModerate bleedingMultivariable analysisHeavy bleedingLNG-IUSMenstrual flowContraceptive counselingUnintended pregnancyBaseline bleeding
2015
Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices
Diedrich J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 822.e1-822.e6. PMID: 26409157, PMCID: PMC4679676, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageCu-intrauterine devicesIntrauterine deviceLNG intrauterine deviceMonth continuation ratesProspective cohort studyCox proportional hazardsSubsequent contraceptive useCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectLess discontinuationMenstrual profileMonths continuationCohort studyHazard ratioPrimary outcomeMultivariable analysisPregnancy historyContinuation ratesContraceptive useIUD continuationDiscontinuationProportional hazardsSurvival analysisLevonorgestrelThree-year continuation of reversible contraception
Diedrich J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert J. Three-year continuation of reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 662.e1-662.e8. PMID: 26259905, PMCID: PMC5292132, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRisk-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae prior to intrauterine device insertion
Grentzer J, Peipert J, Zhao Q, McNicholas C, Secura G, Madden T. Risk-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae prior to intrauterine device insertion. Contraception 2015, 92: 313-318. PMID: 26093189, PMCID: PMC4575889, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMultiple sexual partnersIntrauterine device insertionIUD insertionC. trachomatisN. gonorrhoeaeSexual partnersDevice insertionChlamydia trachomatisNeisseria gonorrhoeaeRisk-based screening strategiesScreening strategyCases of infectionInconsistent condom useRisk-based screeningPositive predictive valueContraceptive CHOICE ProjectGonorrhea infectionIUD usersUniversal screeningRisk-based strategyPredictive valueCondom useSecondary analysisTrachomatisGonorrhoeaePositive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Positive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 354-359. PMID: 25836384, PMCID: PMC4440993, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5190.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPelvic inflammatory diseaseChlamydia trachomatisIUD usersInflammatory diseasesIUD useIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsSelf-reported pelvic inflammatory diseaseNew IUD usersNeisseria gonorrhoeaeMajor public health problemProspective cohort studyHigh-risk womenPublic health problemYears of ageContraceptive CHOICE ProjectBirth control methodsCohort studyWomen 14Subsequent infertilityUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionHigh riskPID ratesPositive testingPreventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 349-353. PMID: 25825986, PMCID: PMC4441000, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsRepeat abortionProspective cohort studyTeen pregnancyReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectYears of ageNon-LARC methodsNon-LARC usersHealth care systemContraceptive method choiceWomen 14Cohort studyContraceptive counselingEffective contraceptionLARC usersContraceptive methodsPregnancyStudy participantsNational ratesGreater continuationCare systemAccess barriersFertility after Intrauterine Device Removal: A Pilot Study
Stoddard A, Xu H, Madden T, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Fertility after Intrauterine Device Removal: A Pilot Study. The European Journal Of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2015, 20: 223-230. PMID: 25751567, PMCID: PMC4536198, DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1010639.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-IUD usersIUD usersFormer IUD usersPregnancy rateContraceptive methodsIntrauterine device removalAfrican American raceActive women 18Years of ageContraceptive CHOICE ProjectAfrican American womenNulliparous womenWomen 18IUD useCox modelContraception useAmerican raceDevice removalHormonal IUDsPregnancyPilot studyHigh efficacyOnly variableWomenCHOICE ProjectThe role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making
Madden T, Secura G, Nease R, Politi M, Peipert J. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 46.e1-46.e6. PMID: 25644443, PMCID: PMC4485538, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up
MCNICHOLAS C, MADDEN T, SECURA G, PEIPERT J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014, 57: 635-643. PMID: 25286295, PMCID: PMC4216614, DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntrauterine DevicesPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultMaternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications
Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Spitznagel E, Bommarito K, Madden T, Olsen M, Subramaniam H, Peipert J, Bierut L. Maternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications. Maternal And Child Health Journal 2014, 19: 1202-1211. PMID: 25366100, PMCID: PMC4418963, DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1624-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComplications of laborPoor fetal growthPregnant womenMaternal morbidityPreterm deliverySevere preeclampsiaFetal distressMild preeclampsiaFetal growthMaternal ageOlder womenGreater oddsUnited States Nationwide Inpatient SampleExtremes of ageNationwide Inpatient SampleYear old womanSeparate logistic regression modelsYears of ageRisk of laborLogistic regression modelsDelivery complicationsClinical confoundersPostpartum hemorrhageInpatient SampleSuch complicationsProvision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirth