2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter care
2014
Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion
Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura G, Eisenberg D, Peipert J. Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2014, 124: 718-726. PMID: 25198262, PMCID: PMC4172535, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000475.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Device ExpulsionIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedKaplan-Meier EstimateLevonorgestrelMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisParityPregnancyPregnancy RateProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsYoung Adult
2011
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Peipert J, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2011, 117: 1105-1113. PMID: 21508749, PMCID: PMC3548669, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31821188ad.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine DevicesKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTransdermal PatchYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceReversible contraception methodsContinuation ratesReversible contraceptionContraception methodsContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodReversible contraception usersProspective cohort studyHigh contraceptive efficacyMonths of enrollmentDepot medroxyprogesterone acetateLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectHigh rateSurvey time pointsCohort studyIntrauterine systemContraceptive pillsMedroxyprogesterone acetateOCP usersContraceptive efficacyHormonal methods