2015
Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease
Lindley K, Madden T, Cahill A, Ludbrook P, Billadello J. Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 126: 363-369. PMID: 26241427, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000911.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAttitude to HealthContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIntrauterine DevicesNeeds AssessmentPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPregnancy, UnplannedReproductive HistorySex CounselingSexual BehaviorUnited StatesConceptsCongenital heart diseaseHeart diseaseUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive useCongenital heart disease clinicCross-sectional studyTime of conceptionDisease clinicPrimary outcomeTotal pregnanciesPregnancy historyActive womenIntrauterine deviceCardiology practiceContraceptive methodsHigh incidenceSubdermal implantsContraception useMost womenPregnancySpecific counselingContraceptionDiseaseWomen
2012
Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1053-9. PMID: 23090522, PMCID: PMC3711380, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182632cd6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContinuation ratesSubdermal implantsInterval placementCox proportional hazards modelInterval insertionHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelContraceptive CHOICE ProjectDiscontinuation ratesIrregular bleedingReversible contraceptivesUnplanned pregnancyCommon reasonHazards modelInduced abortionSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisStudy periodKaplan-Meier estimatorWomenCHOICE ProjectEtonogestrelHigh ratePostabortionStructured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Madden T, Mullersman J, Omvig K, Secura G, Peipert J. Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2012, 88: 243-249. PMID: 22959396, PMCID: PMC3660507, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive counselingContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionPartner clinicsContraceptive methodsFormal health care trainingStructured contraceptive counselingCHOICE ProjectHealth care experiencesPrior health care experienceHealth care trainingIntrauterine deviceSubdermal implants
2010
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Mullersman J, Peipert J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 203: 115.e1-115.e7. PMID: 20541171, PMCID: PMC2910826, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionReversible methodFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective cohort studyPercent of womenCHOICE ProjectBaseline characteristicsCohort studyWomen 14Contraceptive optionsIntrauterine contraceptionSubdermal implantsContraceptive methodsContraceptive choicesContraceptionWomenFinancial barriersPotential participantsTwo-thirdsParticipantsPercentPregnancyOptionsYears