2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter care
2015
Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 349-353. PMID: 25825986, PMCID: PMC4441000, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsRepeat abortionProspective cohort studyTeen pregnancyReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectYears of ageNon-LARC methodsNon-LARC usersHealth care systemContraceptive method choiceWomen 14Cohort studyContraceptive counselingEffective contraceptionLARC usersContraceptive methodsPregnancyStudy participantsNational ratesGreater continuationCare systemAccess barriers
2014
Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirth
2013
Twenty-Four–Month Continuation of Reversible Contraception
O'Neil-Callahan M, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Twenty-Four–Month Continuation of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2013, 122: 1083-1091. PMID: 24104781, PMCID: PMC4012225, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a91f45.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicIntrauterine DevicesIntrauterine Devices, CopperLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateParityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultConceptsNon-LARC methodsContinuation ratesContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective observational cohort studyContraceptive method discontinuationImplant continuation ratesMonth continuation ratesObservational cohort studyMonths of enrollmentHigh continuation ratesReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectShort-acting methodsCohort studyMethod discontinuationContraceptive optionsLARC methodsUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceCost contraceptionLower riskCopper IUDPreventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 289-291. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000429300.39964.d3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancy ratesLARC methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsTeenage birth ratesPregnancy rateRepeat abortionNational ratesAbortion rateProspective cohort studyPrimary study outcomePercentage of abortionsBirth rateContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyProvider referralContinuation ratesEligible participantsContraceptive counselingPostabortion contraceptionEffective contraceptionCost contraceptionPregnancyContraceptionContinuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in Women Undergoing Immediate Postabortion Placement
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in Women Undergoing Immediate Postabortion Placement. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 210-211. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000428166.89557.1d.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContinuation ratesUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsIntrauterine deviceCox proportional hazards modelInterval placementInterval insertionAdjusted hazard ratioProspective cohort studyLikelihood of discontinuationProportional hazards modelReversible contraceptive methodsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyHazard ratioIrregular bleedingRecent pregnancyCommon reasonContraceptive methodsHazards modelPostabortion LARCSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisRepeat abortion
2012
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1291. PMID: 23168752, PMCID: PMC4000282, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsAbortion rateCost contraceptionRepeat abortionActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsTeenage birthsProspective cohort studyEffective contraceptive methodsPercentage of abortionsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectSignificant reductionTeenage birth ratesProvider referralCohort studyContraceptive counselingLARC methodsLarge cohortPregnancyNational ratesCohortAbortion facilitiesContraceptionCHOICE ProjectContinuation of Reversible Contraception in Teenagers and Young Women
Rosenstock J, Peipert J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura G. Continuation of Reversible Contraception in Teenagers and Young Women. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1298. PMID: 23168753, PMCID: PMC4037699, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827499bd.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageReversible contraceptive methodsNon-LARC methodsContinuation ratesMethod continuationLARC methodsContraceptive methodsKaplan-Meier survival curvesYoung womenActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsCox proportional hazards modelContraceptive method discontinuationProspective cohort studyHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelLower continuation ratesContraceptive CHOICE ProjectChart reviewCohort studyDiscontinuation ratesEffect of ageMethod discontinuationClinical significanceReversible contraceptionCost contraception
2011
Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011, 84: 493-498. PMID: 22018123, PMCID: PMC3505875, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectIntrauterine deviceLARC methodsCHOICE ProjectActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsReversible contraception useReversible contraceptive methodsAssociation of ageNon-LARC methodsAdolescent participantsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionHigh riskContraception useContraceptive methodsAdolescent womenYounger groupLARCLittle dataAdolescentsWomenAgeParticipantsAssociationYears