2012
Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1053-9. PMID: 23090522, PMCID: PMC3711380, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182632cd6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContinuation ratesSubdermal implantsInterval placementCox proportional hazards modelInterval insertionHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelContraceptive CHOICE ProjectDiscontinuation ratesIrregular bleedingReversible contraceptivesUnplanned pregnancyCommon reasonHazards modelInduced abortionSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisStudy periodKaplan-Meier estimatorWomenCHOICE ProjectEtonogestrelHigh ratePostabortionImmediate Postabortion Intrauterine Device Insertion: Continuation and Satisfaction
McNicholas C, Hotchkiss T, Madden T, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Immediate Postabortion Intrauterine Device Insertion: Continuation and Satisfaction. Women's Health Issues 2012, 22: e365-e369. PMID: 22749197, PMCID: PMC3608473, DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.04.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, SecondRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationUterine HemorrhageYoung AdultConceptsIntrauterine deviceIUD insertionRetrospective cohort studyGreater gestational ageTime of abortionCohort studyGestational ageHigher parityUnintended pregnancyClinical dataIUD useProcedure notesSatisfaction rateIntake formsWomenShort questionnairePregnancyHigh ratePostabortionSatisfactionDemographics
2011
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Peipert J, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2011, 117: 1105-1113. PMID: 21508749, PMCID: PMC3548669, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31821188ad.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine DevicesKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTransdermal PatchYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceReversible contraception methodsContinuation ratesReversible contraceptionContraception methodsContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodReversible contraception usersProspective cohort studyHigh contraceptive efficacyMonths of enrollmentDepot medroxyprogesterone acetateLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectHigh rateSurvey time pointsCohort studyIntrauterine systemContraceptive pillsMedroxyprogesterone acetateOCP usersContraceptive efficacyHormonal methods
2010
Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data
Kittur N, Secura G, Peipert J, Madden T, Finer L, Allsworth J. Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data. Contraception 2010, 83: 479-485. PMID: 21477693, PMCID: PMC3074095, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemTime of enrollmentContraceptive CHOICE ProjectMissouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemPrevalence estimatesRisk Factor Surveillance SystemContraceptive pill usersReversible contraception useCurrent contraceptive methodCHOICE ProjectNational surveyLARC usePill usersContraceptive useContraceptive methodsContraception useContraceptive prevalenceStudy participantsDemographic characteristicsChoices participantsSurvey weightsNational dataEnrollmentHigh rateLower rates