2021
Contraception and Reproductive Planning for Women With Cardiovascular Disease JACC Focus Seminar 5/5
Lindley K, Merz C, Davis M, Madden T, Park K, Bello N, Group A. Contraception and Reproductive Planning for Women With Cardiovascular Disease JACC Focus Seminar 5/5. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2021, 77: 1823-1834. PMID: 33832608, PMCID: PMC8041063, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular mortality riskReproductive-age womenHigh-risk groupEvidence-based recommendationsContraceptive safetyContraceptive optionsUnplanned pregnancyPregnancy terminationAccurate counselingMortality riskHigh riskCardiovascular teamReproductive planningWomenPregnancyDiseaseRiskPatientsCardiovascularContraception
2020
Decisional conflict associated with clinicians discouraging particular contraceptive methods
Grant R, Paul R, Zeal C, Madden T, Politi M. Decisional conflict associated with clinicians discouraging particular contraceptive methods. Journal Of Evaluation In Clinical Practice 2020, 26: 1612-1619. PMID: 32026566, DOI: 10.1111/jep.13364.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsParticular contraceptive methodsContraceptive methodsSelf-reported outcomesDecisional conflictSide effectsPrimary self-reported outcomesSecondary self-report outcomesProportion of participantsYears of ageSelf-reported qualityContraceptive method selectionUse of contraceptionFemale sexPatient preferencesUnintended pregnancyEligible individualsClinicians' reasonsContraceptive attributesContraceptive featuresCliniciansContraceptive decisionsAnonymous surveyNulliparityPregnancyContraception
2018
The role of narratives in patient-provider discussions about contraceptive decisions
Cusanno B, Estlund A, Madden T, Buckel C, Politi M. The role of narratives in patient-provider discussions about contraceptive decisions. European Journal For Person Centered Healthcare 2018, 6: 307. DOI: 10.5750/ejpch.v6i2.1478.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContraceptive counselingHealth centersContraceptive methodsFederally Qualified Health CentersPatient-provider discussionsQualified health centersCommunity health centersHealth center staffUse of contraceptionUnintended pregnancyContraceptive provisionWomen's selectionPatient decisionPatients' relianceHealthcare encountersPatientsLarger studyClinical encountersContraceptionContraceptive decisionsProvider perspectivesEducational campaignsCounseling sessionsCenter staffHealth narratives
2015
Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease
Lindley K, Madden T, Cahill A, Ludbrook P, Billadello J. Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 126: 363-369. PMID: 26241427, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000911.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAttitude to HealthContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIntrauterine DevicesNeeds AssessmentPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPregnancy, UnplannedReproductive HistorySex CounselingSexual BehaviorUnited StatesConceptsCongenital heart diseaseHeart diseaseUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive useCongenital heart disease clinicCross-sectional studyTime of conceptionDisease clinicPrimary outcomeTotal pregnanciesPregnancy historyActive womenIntrauterine deviceCardiology practiceContraceptive methodsHigh incidenceSubdermal implantsContraception useMost womenPregnancySpecific counselingContraceptionDiseaseWomenContraceptive Counseling in Obese Women
McNicholas C, Zigler R, Madden T. Contraceptive Counseling in Obese Women. 2015, 133-148. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2611-4_9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReproductive-age womenObese womenContraceptive counselingObese reproductive-age womenYoung reproductive age womenEffective contraceptive counselingObesity-related morbidityMedical comorbiditiesNeonatal morbidityUnintended pregnancyWomenHigh associationMorbidityPregnancyCounselingComorbiditiesObesityCliniciansContraception
2014
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up
MCNICHOLAS C, MADDEN T, SECURA G, PEIPERT J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014, 57: 635-643. PMID: 25286295, PMCID: PMC4216614, DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntrauterine DevicesPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultProvision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirth
2013
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 289-291. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000429300.39964.d3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancy ratesLARC methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsTeenage birth ratesPregnancy rateRepeat abortionNational ratesAbortion rateProspective cohort studyPrimary study outcomePercentage of abortionsBirth rateContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyProvider referralContinuation ratesEligible participantsContraceptive counselingPostabortion contraceptionEffective contraceptionCost contraceptionPregnancyContraception
2012
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1291. PMID: 23168752, PMCID: PMC4000282, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsAbortion rateCost contraceptionRepeat abortionActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsTeenage birthsProspective cohort studyEffective contraceptive methodsPercentage of abortionsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectSignificant reductionTeenage birth ratesProvider referralCohort studyContraceptive counselingLARC methodsLarge cohortPregnancyNational ratesCohortAbortion facilitiesContraceptionCHOICE ProjectEffectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal Of Medicine 2012, 366: 1998-2007. PMID: 22621627, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1110855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsIntrauterine DevicesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsLarge prospective cohort studyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsProspective cohort studyContraceptive failure ratesReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionDMPA injectionOverall cohortCohort studyRate of failureContraceptive pillsContraceptive failurePregnancyYoung womenContraceptionPillsOlder participantsAgeFailure rateParticipantsRiskKnowledge of contraceptive effectiveness
Eisenberg D, Secura G, Madden T, Allsworth J, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 206: 479.e1-479.e9. PMID: 22521458, PMCID: PMC4007217, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCondomsContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedMissouriMultivariate AnalysisPoisson DistributionProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultConceptsDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateContraceptive effectivenessComprehensive contraceptive counselingContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCross-sectional analysisContraceptive historyContraceptive counselingIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsWomen's knowledgeKnowledge questionnaireAnnual riskWomenPillsCHOICE ProjectCondomsSignificant knowledge gapsPregnancyCohortContraception
2011
Women's Knowledge About Intrauterine Contraception
Hladky K, Allsworth J, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert J. Women's Knowledge About Intrauterine Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2011, 117: 48-54. PMID: 21173643, PMCID: PMC3244817, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318202b4c9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntrauterine contraceptionWomen's knowledgeReproductive-aged womenHealth care providersPercent of respondentsContraceptive historyContraception usersCare providersContraception useContraceptive methodsSide effectsPolynomial logistic regressionAdult womenLogistic regressionContraceptionEducational interventionWomenKnowledge questionsEight-pageAppropriate candidatesDescriptive statisticsRiskSurvey respondentsSt. Louis areaComplications
2010
Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness among a cohort of St. Louis women choosing reversible contraception
Eisenberg D, Secura G, Madden T, Allsworth J, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness among a cohort of St. Louis women choosing reversible contraception. Contraception 2010, 82: 193. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.062.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Mullersman J, Peipert J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 203: 115.e1-115.e7. PMID: 20541171, PMCID: PMC2910826, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionReversible methodFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective cohort studyPercent of womenCHOICE ProjectBaseline characteristicsCohort studyWomen 14Contraceptive optionsIntrauterine contraceptionSubdermal implantsContraceptive methodsContraceptive choicesContraceptionWomenFinancial barriersPotential participantsTwo-thirdsParticipantsPercentPregnancyOptionsYears