2014
Open-label randomized clinical trial of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by FEC versus the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus followed by FEC in women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer †
Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Akcakanat A, Liu S, Green MC, Murray JL, Chen H, Palla SL, Koenig KB, Brewster AM, Valero V, Ibrahim NK, Moulder-Thompson S, Litton JK, Tarco E, Moore J, Flores P, Crawford D, Dryden MJ, Symmans WF, Sahin A, Giordano SH, Pusztai L, Do K, Mills GB, Hortobagyi GN, Meric-Bernstam F. Open-label randomized clinical trial of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by FEC versus the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus followed by FEC in women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer †. Annals Of Oncology 2014, 25: 1122-1127. PMID: 24669015, PMCID: PMC4037860, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu124.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerPathological complete responseStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyReverse phase protein arrayBreast cancerPrimary triple-negative breast cancerMTOR pathwayReceptor-negative breast cancerTriple receptor-negative breast cancerAddition of everolimusGrade 3 pneumonitisGrade 3/4 stomatitisPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayRash/desquamationClinical response rateGrade 3/4 toxicitiesPhase II studyClinical end pointsCombination of paclitaxelAKT/mTOR pathwayDirect antiproliferative activityBreast cancer cellsDownregulation of mTORII study
2011
Open label, randomized clinical trial of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by FEC (T-FEC) versus the combination of paclitaxel and RAD001 followed by FEC (TR-FEC) in women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Gonzalez-Angulo A, Green M, Murray J, Palla S, Koenig K, Brewster A, Valero V, Ibrahim N, Moulder S, Litton J, Crawford D, Flores P, Dryden M, Symmans W, Giordano S, Pusztai L, Buzdar A, Mills G, Hortobagyi G, Meric-Bernstam F. Open label, randomized clinical trial of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by FEC (T-FEC) versus the combination of paclitaxel and RAD001 followed by FEC (TR-FEC) in women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29: 1016-1016. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1016.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2005
Nomograms to Predict Pathologic Complete Response and Metastasis-Free Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Rouzier R, Pusztai L, Delaloge S, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Andre F, Hess KR, Buzdar AU, Garbay JR, Spielmann M, Mathieu MC, Symmans WF, Wagner P, Atallah D, Valero V, Berry DA, Hortobagyi GN. Nomograms to Predict Pathologic Complete Response and Metastasis-Free Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2005, 23: 8331-8339. PMID: 16293864, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.01.2898.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDecision Making, Computer-AssistedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFranceHumansInternetLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyNomogramsPaclitaxelPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsTexasConceptsDistant metastasis-free survivalPathologic complete responseMetastasis-free survivalPreoperative chemotherapyComplete responseCox proportional hazards regression modelProportional hazards regression modelsM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterPreoperative chemotherapy cyclesSchedule of paclitaxelCombination of paclitaxelEstrogen receptor statusHazards regression modelsMultivariate logistic regressionInstitut Gustave RoussyAnderson Cancer CenterInclusion of paclitaxelClinical prediction modelChemotherapy cyclesReceptor statusClinical stageClinical variablesHistologic gradeCancer CenterPrediction nomogram