2020
Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race
Kim Y, Park J, Essa M, Lansky AJ, Sugeng L. Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 125: 1782-1787. PMID: 32471549, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionMechanical circulatory supportCardiogenic shockNational Inpatient SampleHospital mortalityBlack patientsInpatient SampleMCS devicesPopulation-based retrospective cohort studyMCS utilizationMechanical circulatory support devicesOnly black patientsRetrospective cohort studyClinical Modification codesMultivariate logistic regressionCirculatory support devicesAcute clinical scenariosHospital outcomesCohort studyPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesHospital eventsCirculatory supportNinth RevisionMyocardial infarction
2005
Randomized comparison of carbon ion–implanted stent versus bare metal stent in coronary artery disease: The Asian Pacific Multicenter Arthos Stent Study (PASS) trial
Kim YH, Lee CW, Hong MK, Park SW, Tahk SJ, Yang JY, Saito S, Santoso T, Quan L, Ge J, Weissman NJ, Lansky AJ, Mintz GS, Park SJ. Randomized comparison of carbon ion–implanted stent versus bare metal stent in coronary artery disease: The Asian Pacific Multicenter Arthos Stent Study (PASS) trial. American Heart Journal 2005, 149: 336-341. PMID: 15846274, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsAngiographic restenosis rateLong-term outcomesLate lossRestenosis rateGroup 2Group 1Adverse cardiac eventsNative coronary lesionsNonfatal myocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseMulticenter clinical studyLesion revascularizationPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsBaseline characteristicsCardiac eventsArtery diseaseCoronary lesionsHospital eventsRandomized comparisonBare metalMyocardial infarctionClinical studiesInflammatory reaction
2002
Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries
Ashby DT, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Narasimaiah R, Iakovou I, Polena S, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2002, 89: 1162-1166. PMID: 12008168, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02297-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedArteriesBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary VesselsDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyStentsStroke VolumeSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionTarget lesion revascularizationProximal LAD arteryProximal rightClinical restenosisCoronary interventionCircumflex arteryProcedural successLAD arteryProximal coronary artery stenosisSingle-vessel coronary diseaseAnterior descending (LAD) stenosisHigh rateCircumflex coronary arteryLower procedural successCoronary artery stenosisSignificant differencesDifferent lesion locationsCoronary artery stentsLesion revascularizationProximal LADCoronary diseaseArtery stenosisClinical outcomesHospital events
2001
Influence of gender on early and one-year clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft stenting
Ahmed J, Dangas G, Lansky A, Mehran R, Hong M, Mintz G, Pichard A, Satler L, Kent K, Stone G, Leon M. Influence of gender on early and one-year clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft stenting. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2001, 87: 401-405. PMID: 11179522, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01391-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute renal failureClinical outcomesSVG lesionsHospital mortalityVascular complicationsRenal failureProcedural successStent implantationFemale genderOne-year clinical outcomesSaphenous vein graft stentingLate clinical outcomesOverall procedural successSaphenous vein graftsVentricular ejection fractionInfluence of genderMultivariate regression analysisGraft stentingLesion revascularizationCoronary revascularizationConsecutive patientsDiabetes mellitusEjection fractionHospital eventsVein grafts
2000
Importance of lesion length on new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries
Saucedo J, Kennard E, Popma J, Talley D, Lansky A, Leon M, Baim D. Importance of lesion length on new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2000, 50: 19-25. PMID: 10816274, DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200005)50:1<19::aid-ccd4>3.0.co;2-h.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationNew device angioplastyMore target lesion revascularizationLesion revascularizationLong lesionsLesion lengthRight coronary artery diseaseSmaller minimal lumen diameterLong lesion groupMore multivessel diseaseNative coronary arteriesCoronary artery diseaseCoronary Intervention RegistryEarly clinical eventsMinimal lumen diameterLonger lesion lengthMultivessel diseaseAngiographic outcomesIntervention RegistryArtery diseaseClinical outcomesHospital eventsTotal occlusionClinical eventsCoronary artery