2024
Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
Kim I, Wang A, Corpuz G, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Brito J, Renzulli J, Kim I. Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate International 2024, 12: 70-78. PMID: 39036758, PMCID: PMC11255894, DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPelvic lymph node dissectionBenefit of pelvic lymph node dissectionGleason grade groupLymph node dissectionProstate cancer patientsRadical prostatectomyNode dissectionProstate cancer treated with radical prostatectomyCancer patientsAssociated with improved OSTime of radical prostatectomyGrade groupSurvival of prostate cancer patientsMedian PSA valuePre-operative characteristicsProstate cancer-specificTime of RPLog-rank testKaplan-Meier curvesPSA valuesSurvival benefitProstate cancerMedian ageClinical benefitCancer-specific
2018
Is PI-RADS 3/total lesion ratio associated with clinically-significant prostate cancer in patients with equivocal-risk lesions on multi-parametric MRI?
Ghabili K, Swallow M, Suarez-Sarmiento A, Syed J, Leapman M, Weinreb J, Sprenkle P. Is PI-RADS 3/total lesion ratio associated with clinically-significant prostate cancer in patients with equivocal-risk lesions on multi-parametric MRI? Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 149-149. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.149.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSmaller prostate volumeMulti-parametric MRISignificant prostate cancerProstate volumeProstate cancerROI ratioPSA densityGrade groupPrediction of csPCaRisk of csPCaData System (BI-RADS) category 3Prostate Imaging ReportingMpMRI findingsBiopsy databasePrior diagnosisTargeted biopsiesFusion biopsyPositive coresCsPCaUnnecessary biopsiesBiopsyMultivariate analysisPatientsImaging ReportingLesions
2016
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes
Leapman MS, Cowan JE, Simko J, Roberge G, Stohr BA, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes. European Urology 2016, 71: 750-759. PMID: 27940155, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of PCSMGleason grade groupBone metastasesProstate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registryGroup ICox proportional hazards modelGrade groupBone metastatic progressionGrade group IPrimary androgen deprivationPrognostic grade groupingKaplan-Meier methodProstate cancer outcomesProportional hazards modelGroup VProstate cancer pathologyNondefinitive therapyDefinitive therapyConservative managementUnadjusted riskAndrogen deprivationGleason sumGleason scoreCancer outcomesGrouping systemExternal validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system.
Leapman M, Cowan J, Roberge G, Eltemamy M, Simko J, Carroll P, Cooperberg M. External validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 123-123. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.123.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancer-specific mortalityRisk of recurrenceGleason grade groupRadical prostatectomyAdjusted pairwise comparisonsGrade groupUCSF cohortGrade diseaseGleason 4Metastatic progressionCox proportional hazards modelGleason classification systemGrade classification systemImmediate radical prostatectomyCancer-specific mortalityAcademic referral centerHigh-grade diseaseIndependent prognostic abilityProportional hazards modelConsecutive PSA valuesDiscrimination of outcomesGleason grading systemGleason grade 3Salvage treatmentReferral center