2023
Breast cancers with high proliferation and low ER-related signalling have poor prognosis and unique molecular features with implications for therapy
Licata L, Barreca M, Galbardi B, Dugo M, Viale G, Győrffy B, Karn T, Pusztai L, Gianni L, Callari M, Bianchini G. Breast cancers with high proliferation and low ER-related signalling have poor prognosis and unique molecular features with implications for therapy. British Journal Of Cancer 2023, 129: 2025-2033. PMID: 37935787, PMCID: PMC10703787, DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02477-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationCyclinsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisConceptsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPoor prognosisBreast cancerTreatment responseHigher pathological complete response rateResponse rateHigh pathological response ratePathological complete response ratePathological response rateComplete response rateHigher proliferationHigh recurrence riskMolecular featuresEndocrine therapyLower ERHigh TMBDismal outcomePIK3CA mutationsMethodsGene expression dataClinical dataT cellsPotential therapyRecurrence riskTumorsUnique molecular featuresImmunological and clinicopathological features predict HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis in the neoadjuvant NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601 randomized trials
Rediti M, Fernandez-Martinez A, Venet D, Rothé F, Hoadley K, Parker J, Singh B, Campbell J, Ballman K, Hillman D, Winer E, El-Abed S, Piccart M, Di Cosimo S, Symmans W, Krop I, Salgado R, Loi S, Pusztai L, Perou C, Carey L, Sotiriou C. Immunological and clinicopathological features predict HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis in the neoadjuvant NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601 randomized trials. Nature Communications 2023, 14: 7053. PMID: 37923752, PMCID: PMC10624889, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42635-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEvent-free survivalHER2-positive breast cancerPathological complete responseCALGB 40601Breast cancerBreast pathological complete responseStromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytesHormone receptor statusPhase III trialsClinical nodal statusIndependent prognostic factorTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesIdentification of patientsBreast cancer prognosisT cell receptorNeoadjuvant paclitaxelNeoadjuvant therapyIII trialsNodal statusComplete responsePrognostic factorsPrognostic scoreReceptor statusClinicopathological featuresResidual diseaseStandardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP
Litton J, Regan M, Pusztai L, Rugo H, Tolaney S, Garrett-Mayer E, Amiri-Kordestani L, Basho R, Best A, Boileau J, Denkert C, Foster J, Harbeck N, Jacene H, King T, Mason G, O'Sullivan C, Prowell T, Richardson A, Sepulveda K, Smith M, Tjoe J, Turashvili G, Woodward W, Butler L, Schwartz E, Korde L. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 4433-4442. PMID: 37433103, PMCID: PMC10522109, DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00435.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProgression-Free SurvivalResearch DesignConceptsSecondary end pointsPathologic complete responseClinical trialsEnd pointStandardized definitionsHormone receptor-positive diseaseCurative-intent surgeryNeoadjuvant clinical trialsPathologic nodal evaluationResidual invasive cancerEfficacy end pointReceptor-positive diseaseBreast cancer clinical trialsResidual cancer burdenAlternative end pointsTrial end pointsRegional lymph nodesCancer end pointsCross-trial comparisonsSurvival end pointsEnd point definitionsCancer clinical trialsDrug Administration (FDA) regulatory considerationsEfficacy outcomesComplete responseASO Visual Abstract: Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancers—Catching up with the Rest
Kim L, Coman M, Pusztai L, Park T. ASO Visual Abstract: Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancers—Catching up with the Rest. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2023, 30: 6452-6453. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13842-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNeoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early, Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Catching Up with the Rest
Kim L, Coman M, Pusztai L, Park T. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early, Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Catching Up with the Rest. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2023, 30: 6441-6449. PMID: 37349612, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13714-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerTumor mutational burdenBreast cancerAdjuvant therapyPathological complete response rateImmune checkpoint modulationComplete response rateExcellent clinical outcomesCombination immunochemotherapyNeoadjuvant immunotherapyNeoadjuvant settingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalPD-L1Checkpoint modulationClinical outcomesMajor trialsMutational burdenResponse rateCancer typesCancerTherapyBiomarkersOutcomesExciting advances
2022
The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant and post-neoadjuvant breast cancer settings.
Pusztai L. The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant and post-neoadjuvant breast cancer settings. Clinical Advances In Hematology And Oncology 2022, 20: 552-555. PMID: 36125946.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC.
Foldi J, Kahn A, Silber A, Qing T, Reisenbichler E, Fischbach N, Persico J, Adelson K, Katoch A, Chagpar A, Park T, Blanchard A, Blenman K, Rimm DL, Pusztai L. Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC. Clinical Cancer Research 2022, 28: 3720-3728. PMID: 35903931, PMCID: PMC9444984, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0862.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsImmune-related adverse eventsTriple-negative breast cancerNon-AA patientsEvent-free survivalPhase I/II clinical trialsClinical trialsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalAA patientsEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerIncidence of irAEsPathologic complete response rateSignificant associationMultivariate logistic regression analysisTumor-infiltrating lymphocyte countsComplete response ratePrimary efficacy endpointPD-L1 statusProportional hazards modelLogistic regression analysisAfrican American womenEFS ratesNeoadjuvant immunotherapyEfficacy endpointAdverse eventsRedefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies
Wolf DM, Yau C, Wulfkuhle J, Brown-Swigart L, Gallagher RI, Lee PRE, Zhu Z, Magbanua MJ, Sayaman R, O’Grady N, Basu A, Delson A, Coppé JP, Lu R, Braun J, Investigators I, Asare SM, Sit L, Matthews JB, Perlmutter J, Hylton N, Liu MC, Pohlmann P, Symmans WF, Rugo HS, Isaacs C, DeMichele AM, Yee D, Berry DA, Pusztai L, Petricoin EF, Hirst GL, Esserman LJ, van 't Veer LJ. Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies. Cancer Cell 2022, 40: 609-623.e6. PMID: 35623341, PMCID: PMC9426306, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.05.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer subtypesHormone receptorsHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statusCancer subtypesEpidermal growth factor receptor 2 statusPathologic complete response rateTreatment prioritizationComplete response ratePatient selectionPredictive biomarkersTreatment allocationPlatform trialsClinical dataLuminal phenotypeTreatment selectionResponse rateTumor biologyNew treatmentsDrug responseSubtypesCancer therapyBiomarkersProtein/phosphoproteinGene expressionDiverse biologyTreatment Efficacy Score—continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials
Marczyk M, Mrukwa A, Yau C, Wolf D, Chen Y, Balassanian R, Nanda R, Parker B, Krings G, Sattar H, Zeck J, Albain K, Boughey J, Liu M, Elias A, Clark A, Venters S, Shad S, Basu A, Asare S, Buxton M, Asare A, Rugo H, Perlmutter J, DeMichele A, Yee D, Berry D, Veer L, Symmans W, Esserman L, Pusztai L, Consortium I. Treatment Efficacy Score—continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials. Annals Of Oncology 2022, 33: 814-823. PMID: 35513244, DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.072.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTrial armsExperimental armSurvival differencesExact testPathologic complete response rateClinical trial armsI-SPY2 trialNeoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacyComplete response rateBreast cancer trialsCytotoxic efficacyFisher's exact testImpact of treatmentNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPCR ratePathologic responseResidual cancerControl cohortCancer trialsAssessed associationsChemotherapy efficacyEarly surrogateOlaparib armResponse rateHigher cytotoxic efficacyPredictive Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with Nab-Paclitaxel and Dose-Dense Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Blenman KRM, Marczyk M, Karn T, Qing T, Li X, Gunasekharan V, Yaghoobi V, Bai Y, Ibrahim EY, Park T, Silber A, Wolf DM, Reisenbichler E, Denkert C, Sinn BV, Rozenblit M, Foldi J, Rimm DL, Loibl S, Pusztai L. Predictive Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with Nab-Paclitaxel and Dose-Dense Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2022, 28: 2587-2597. PMID: 35377948, PMCID: PMC9464605, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3215.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBasal-like triple-negative breast cancerPathologic complete responseResidual diseaseNeoadjuvant durvalumabDNA damage repairSomatic mutationsBreast cancerWnt/β-cateninHigh expressionTriple-negative breast cancerBasal-Like TripleDoxorubicin/cyclophosphamideDNA repairTumor mutation burdenRNA sequencingEpithelial-mesenchymal transitionFive-gene signatureB-cell markersCancer driversEnrichment analysisNegative breast cancerDamage repairGene expressionJAK-STATCell cycleEvent-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Andersen J, Patt D, Danso M, Ferreira M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Im SA, Ahn JH, Gion M, Baron-Hay S, Boileau JF, Ding Y, Tryfonidis K, Aktan G, Karantza V, O'Shaughnessy J. Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2022, 386: 556-567. PMID: 35139274, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2112651.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProgression-Free SurvivalTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsEarly triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerEvent-free survivalCycles of pembrolizumabPathological complete responseDefinitive surgeryBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete responseLonger event-free survivalUntreated stage IIPrimary end pointPhase 3 trialSecond primary cancerDoxorubicin-cyclophosphamideNeoadjuvant pembrolizumabNeoadjuvant phaseAdjuvant therapyDistant recurrenceNeoadjuvant therapyAdverse eventsPrimary cancerSafety profileDisease progressionPembrolizumab
2021
Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients
Yau C, Osdoit M, van der Noordaa M, Shad S, Wei J, de Croze D, Hamy AS, Laé M, Reyal F, Sonke GS, Steenbruggen TG, van Seijen M, Wesseling J, Martín M, del Monte-Millán M, López-Tarruella S, Consortium I, Adamson K, Albain K, Asare A, Asare S, Balassanian R, Beckwith H, Berry S, Berry D, Boughey J, Buxton M, Chen Y, Chen B, Chien A, Chui S, Clark A, Clennell J, Datnow B, DeMichele A, Duan X, Edmiston K, Elias A, Ellis E, Esserman L, Euhus D, Fadare O, Fan F, Feldman M, Forero-Torres A, Haley B, Han H, Harada S, Haugen P, Helsten T, Hirst G, Hylton N, Isaacs C, Kemmer K, Khan Q, Khazai L, Klein M, Krings G, Lang J, LeBeau L, Leyland-Jones B, Liu M, Lo S, Lu J, Magliocco A, Matthews J, Melisko M, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Moulder S, Murthy R, Nanda R, Northfelt D, Ocal I, Olopade O, Pambuccian S, Paoloni M, Park J, Parker B, Perlmutter J, Peterson G, Pusztai L, Rendi M, Rugo H, Sahoo S, Sams S, Sanil A, Sattar H, Schwab R, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Stringer-Reasor E, Symmans W, Tawfik O, Tripathy D, Troxell M, Veer L, Venters S, Vinh T, Viscusi R, Wallace A, Wei S, Wilson A, Yau C, Yee D, Zeck J, Boughey J, Goetz M, Hoskin T, Gould R, Valero V, Edge S, Abraham J, Bartlett J, Caldas C, Dunn J, Earl H, Hayward L, Hiller L, Provenzano E, Sammut S, Thomas J, Cameron D, Graham A, Hall P, Mackintosh L, Fan F, Godwin A, Schwensen K, Sharma P, DeMichele A, Cole K, Pusztai L, Kim M, van 't Veer L, Esserman L, Symmans W. Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients. The Lancet Oncology 2021, 23: 149-160. PMID: 34902335, PMCID: PMC9455620, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00589-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsResidual cancer burdenEvent-free survivalRCB scoreHER2-positive groupNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancer subtypesBreast cancerHazard ratioCancer subtypesNodal statusCancer burdenT categoryEvent-free survival eventsPooled patient-level analysisLong-term survival outcomesPractice settingsWorse event-free survivalClinical T categoryHigher RCB scoresStandard pathology reportingHER2-negative patientsHormone receptor statusHER2-negative groupLong-term prognosisPrimary stage IAssessment of Residual Cancer Burden and Event-Free Survival in Neoadjuvant Treatment for High-risk Breast Cancer
Symmans WF, Yau C, Chen YY, Balassanian R, Klein ME, Pusztai L, Nanda R, Parker BA, Datnow B, Krings G, Wei S, Feldman MD, Duan X, Chen B, Sattar H, Khazai L, Zeck JC, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Rendi M, Sahoo S, Ocal IT, Fan F, LeBeau LG, Vinh T, Troxell ML, Chien AJ, Wallace AM, Forero-Torres A, Ellis E, Albain KS, Murthy RK, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Haley BB, Elias AD, Clark AS, Kemmer K, Isaacs C, Lang JE, Han HS, Edmiston K, Viscusi RK, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Leyland-Jones B, Venters SJ, Shad S, Matthews JB, Asare SM, Buxton M, Asare AL, Rugo HS, Schwab RB, Helsten T, Hylton NM, van ’t Veer L, Perlmutter J, DeMichele AM, Yee D, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Assessment of Residual Cancer Burden and Event-Free Survival in Neoadjuvant Treatment for High-risk Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncology 2021, 7: 1654-1663. PMID: 34529000, PMCID: PMC8446908, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3690.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEvent-free survivalPathologic complete responseResidual cancer burdenInvestigational agentsInvestigational treatmentBreast cancerInterpretation of efficacyNeoadjuvant treatmentCancer burdenClinical trialsImproved event-free survivalNeoadjuvant breast cancer trialsStage 2/3 breast cancerHigh-risk breast cancerHormone receptorsI-SPY2 trialSecondary end pointsBreast cancer trialsEffective neoadjuvant treatmentI-SPY2Neoadjuvant paclitaxelNeoadjuvant trialsComplete responseEarly recurrencePrognostic significanceComparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen
Olawoyin OM, Mehta S, Chouairi F, Gabrick KS, Avraham T, Pusztai L, Alperovich M. Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2021, 148: 1186-1196. PMID: 34644277, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008505.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy regimensMicrovascular breast reconstructionNeoadjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy regimensComplication rateFat necrosisBreast reconstructionImmune cellsCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELMultivariate binary logistic regressionYale-New Haven HospitalAdministration of taxanesBreast Reconstruction ComplicationsInclusion of anthracyclinesNeoadjuvant chemotherapy regimenDosage of chemotherapyNew Haven HospitalNeoadjuvant chemotherapy completionLogistic regression modelsBinary logistic regressionOncologic historyTaxane administrationChemotherapy regimenChemotherapy completionPathologic responseAlpha-smooth muscle actin expression in the stroma predicts resistance to trastuzumab in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer
Vathiotis IA, Moutafi MK, Divakar P, Aung TN, Qing T, Fernandez A, Yaghoobi V, El-Abed S, Wang Y, Guillaume S, Nuciforo P, Huober J, Di Cosimo S, Kim SB, Harbeck N, Gomez H, Shafi S, Syrigos KN, Fountzilas G, Sotiriou C, Pusztai L, Warren S, Rimm DL. Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in the stroma predicts resistance to trastuzumab in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 27: 6156-6163. PMID: 34465600, PMCID: PMC8595766, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2103.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDisease-free survivalHER2-positive breast cancerShorter disease-free survivalBreast cancerQuantitative immunofluorescenceEarly-stage HER2-positive breast cancerAlpha-smooth muscle actin expressionAlpha-smooth muscle actinProgesterone receptor statusHigh α-SMA expressionDigital Spatial ProfilerΑ-SMA expressionPromising candidate biomarkerCompanion diagnostic testsMuscle actin expressionDigital spatial profilingCohort validationNeoadjuvant lapatinibAdjuvant trastuzumabReceptor statusClinical trialsUnivariate analysisEstrogen receptorMAIN OUTCOMEΑ-SMACopy number aberration analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy: results from the NeoALTTO phase III clinical trial.
Venet D, Rediti M, Maetens M, Fumagalli D, Brown DN, Majjaj S, Salgado R, Pusztai L, Harbeck N, El-Abed S, Wang Y, Saura C, Gomez H, Semiglazov VF, de Azambuja E, Huober J, Nuciforo P, Di Cosimo S, Piccart M, Loi S, Rothé F, Sotiriou C. Copy number aberration analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy: results from the NeoALTTO phase III clinical trial. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 27: clincanres.1317.2021. PMID: 34321278, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1317.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic complete responseNeoALTTO trialCopy number aberrationsBreast cancerHER2-positive early-stage breast cancerEstrogen receptor-positive subgroupNeoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapyEarly-stage breast cancerHER2-positive breast cancerPhase III clinical trialsAnti-HER2 therapyAnti-HER2 agentsPredictors of responseReceptor-positive subgroupNumber aberration analysisCopy number levelsWarrants further investigationHeterogeneity of responseComplete responseSurvival outcomesWhole cohortClinical trialsImmune processesPatientsSignificant associationTumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Wulfkhule JD, Gallagher RI, Sun X, Axelrod ML, Sheng Q, Luo N, Gomez H, Sanchez V, Sanders M, Pusztai L, Petricoin E, Blenman K, Balko JM, Team I, Leyland-Jones B, Agency C, Chia S, Serpanchy R, Yu C, University E, McMillan S, Mosley R, Nguyen K, Wood E, Zelnak A, University G, Dillis C, Donnelly R, Harrington T, Isaacs C, Kallakury B, Liu M, Lynce F, Oppong B, Pohlmann P, Tousimis E, Warren R, Willey S, Wong J, Zeck J, Center L, Albain K, Bartolotta M, Bova D, Brooks C, Busby B, Czaplicki K, Duan X, Gamez R, Ganesh K, Gaynor E, Godellas C, Grace-Louthen C, Kuritza T, Lo S, Nagamine A, Perez C, Robinson P, Rosi D, Vaince F, Ward K, Hospital I, Choquette K, Edmiston K, Gallimore H, McGovern J, Mokarem K, Pajaniappan M, Rassulova S, Scott K, Sherwood K, Wright J, Clinic A, Anderson K, Gray R, Myers S, Northfelt D, Pockaj B, Roedig J, Wasif N, Clinic R, Arens A, Boughey J, Brandt K, Carroll J, Chen B, Connors A, Degnim A, Farley D, Greenlee S, Haddad T, Hieken T, Hobday T, Jakub J, Liberte L, Liu M, Loprinzi C, Menard L, Moe M, Moynihan T, O'Sullivan C, Olson E, Peethambaram P, Ruddy K, Russell B, Rynearson A, Smith D, Visscher D, Windish A, Institute H, Cox K, Dawson K, Newton O, Ramirez W, University O, Bengtson H, Bucher J, Chui S, Gilbert-Ghormley B, Hampton R, Kemmer K, Kurdyla D, Nauman D, Spear J, Wilson A, Institute S, Beatty D, Dawson P, Ellis E, Fer M, Hanson J, Goetz M, Haddad T, Iriarte D, Kaplan H, Porter B, Rinn K, Thomas H, Thornton S, Tickman R, Varghis N, Birmingham U, Caterinichia V, Santos J, Falkson C, Forero A, Krontiras H, Vaklavas C, Wei S, University of Arizona, Bauland A, Inclan L, Lewallen D, Powell A, Roney C, Schmidt K, Viscusi R, Wright H, University of California S, Blair S, Boles S, Bykowski J, Datnow B, Densley L, Eghtedari M, Genna V, Hasteh F, Helsten T, Kormanik P, Ojeda-Fournier H, Onyeacholem I, Parker B, Podsada K, Schwab R, Wallace A, Yashar C, University of California S, Alvarado M, Au A, Balassanian R, Benz C, Buxton M, Chen Y, Chien J, D'Andrea C, Davis S, Esserman L, Ewing C, Goga A, Hirst G, Hwang M, Hylton N, Joe B, Lyandres J, Kadafour M, Krings G, Melisko M, Moasser M, Munter P, Ngo Z, Park J, Price E, Rugo H, Veer L, Wong J, Yau C, University of Chicago, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Nanda R, Olopade F, Schacht D, University of Colorado D, Borges V, Colvin T, Diamond J, Elias A, Finlayson C, Fisher C, Hardesty L, Kabos P, Kounalakis N, Mayordomo J, McSpadden T, Murphy C, Rabinovitch R, Sams S, Shagisultanova E, University of Kansas, Baccaray S, Khan Q, University of Minnesota, Beckwith H, Blaes A, Emory T, Haddad T, Hui J, Klein M, Kuehn-Hajder J, Nelson M, Potter D, Tuttle T, Yee D, Zera R, University of Pennsylvania, Bayne L, Bradbury A, Clark A, DeMichele A, Domchek S, Fisher C, Fox K, Frazee D, Lackaye M, Matro J, McDonald E, Rosen M, Shah P, Tchou J, Volpe M, Center U, Alvarez R, Barcenas C, Berry D, Booser D, Brewster A, Brown P, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Ibrahim N, Karuturi M, Koenig K, Moulder S, Murray J, Murthy R, Pusztai L, Saigal B, Symmans W, Tripathy D, Theriault R, Ueno N, Valero V, California U, Brown M, Carranza M, Flores Y, Lang J, Luna A, Perez N, Tripathy D, Watkins K, Center U, Armstrong S, Boyd C, Chen L, Clark V, Frankel A, Euhus D, Froehlich T, Goudreau S, Haley B, Harker-Murray A, Klemow D, Leitch A, Leon R, Li H, Morgan T, Qureshi N, Rao R, Reeves M, Rivers A, Sadeghi N, Seiler S, Staves B, Tagoe V, Thomas G, Tripathy D, Unni N, Weyandt S, Wooldridge R, Zuckerman J, Universty of Washington, Korde L, Griffin M, Butler B, Cundy A, Rubinstein L, Hixson C. Tumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 27: 5299-5306. PMID: 34315723, PMCID: PMC8792110, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0607.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyTriple-negative breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerMHC-IITumor cellsAnti-PD-1/L1 therapyEstrogen receptor-positive breast cancerPhase II/III clinical trialsNeoadjuvant breast cancer settingPathologic complete response rateHER2-negative breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerAddition of immunotherapyHLA-DR positivityBreast cancer settingComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsCohort of patientsEarly breast cancerMHC-II expressionPan-cancer biomarkerImmunotherapy benefitL1 therapyMost patientsOptimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy
Foldi J, Rozenblit M, Park TS, Knowlton CA, Golshan M, Moran M, Pusztai L. Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Current Treatment Options In Oncology 2021, 22: 79. PMID: 34213636, DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00879-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic complete responseResidual cancerClinical trialsAdjuvant therapyExcellent long-term disease-free survivalLong-term disease-free survivalAxillary lymph node dissectionHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Early-stage breast cancerEpidermal growth factor receptor 2Post-mastectomy breastSystemic adjuvant therapyInternal mammary nodesLymph node dissectionNeoadjuvant systemic therapyDisease-free survivalGrowth factor receptor 2Minimal residual disease monitoringRecurrence-free survivalType of surgeryPivotal clinical trialsOngoing clinical trialsFactor receptor 2Residual disease monitoringAccurate prognostic estimatesDurvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial
Pusztai L, Yau C, Wolf DM, Han HS, Du L, Wallace AM, String-Reasor E, Boughey JC, Chien AJ, Elias AD, Beckwith H, Nanda R, Albain KS, Clark AS, Kemmer K, Kalinsky K, Isaacs C, Thomas A, Shatsky R, Helsten TL, Forero-Torres A, Liu MC, Brown-Swigart L, Petricoin EF, Wulfkuhle JD, Asare SM, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Sit L, Hirst GL, Berry S, Sanil A, Asare AL, Matthews JB, Perlmutter J, Melisko M, Rugo HS, Schwab RB, Symmans WF, Yee D, Van't Veer LJ, Hylton NM, DeMichele AM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. Cancer Cell 2021, 39: 989-998.e5. PMID: 34143979, PMCID: PMC11064785, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerI-SPY2 trialBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyStage II/III HER2-negative breast cancerStage II/III breast cancerGrade 3 adverse eventsPathologic complete response ratePD-L1 inhibitor durvalumabMast cell signaturePaclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyHER2-negative cancersPARP inhibitor olaparibAdverse eventsGene expression signaturesCare controlSuperior efficacyImmune responseResponse rateCancerInhibitor olaparibNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy use in early stage breast cancer during the covid-19 pandemic
Park KU, Gregory M, Bazan J, Lustberg M, Rosenberg S, Blinder V, Sharma P, Pusztai L, Shen C, Partridge A, Thompson A. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy use in early stage breast cancer during the covid-19 pandemic. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2021, 188: 249-258. PMID: 33651271, PMCID: PMC7921279, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06153-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCOVID-19FemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2ConceptsAxillary lymph node dissectionNeoadjuvant endocrine therapyMedical oncologistsRadiation oncologistsOmission of ALNDEstrogen positive breast cancer patientsPositive breast cancer patientsEarly-stage breast cancerEndocrine therapy useMetastatic axillary diseaseLymph node dissectionBreast cancer patientsMultidisciplinary tumor boardStage breast cancerClinical trial organizationsPercent of practicesUS medical oncologistsCOVID-19 pandemicPre-pandemic timesRegional COVID-19 casesAxillary diseaseMicrometastatic nodesSurgery 2Endocrine therapyLocoregional management