2016
The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems
Kellmeyer P, Cochrane T, Müller O, Mitchell C, Ball T, Fins J, Biller-Andorno N. The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2016, 25: 623-633. PMID: 27634714, DOI: 10.1017/s0963180116000359.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClosed-loop medical devicesRepresentatives of patient advocacy groupsMedical lawLegal accountabilityLegal frameworkDecisionmaking capacityRestoring communication abilitiesPersonal autonomyMedical ethicsPatient autonomyMedical devicesAdvocacy groupsAutonomyMedical neuroscienceTask ForceAccountsPatient advocacy groupsPersonsLawConsentComputer scienceRefusalDecisionmakingEthicsAgencies
2000
Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: a valid distinction? University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel.
Miller F, Fins J, Snyder L. Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: a valid distinction? University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2000, 132: 470-5. PMID: 10733447, DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-6-200003210-00008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAssisted suicideRefusal of treatmentIssue of physician-assisted suicideRefusal of life-sustaining treatmentPhysician-assisted suicideLife-sustaining treatmentWithdrawal of treatmentArtificial nutritionContinuing debatePolicy hingesRefusalSuicideEthicsArgumentsDebatesIssuesPracticePolicyConfusion