Validation of Recent Response Criteria (ELN-22, IWG-23 and PB-CR) in 1634 MDS/CMML/AML Patients Treated with HMA or HMA-Ven Using CPH Models and a CPH Deep Neural Network - Can or Should Response Criteria be Harmonized for Similarly Treated Patients?
Pleyer L, Vaisband M, Klammer P, Drost M, Angermann H, Keil F, Petzer V, Heibl S, Moritz J, Girschikofsky M, Stampfl-Mattersberger M, Pichler A, Hartmann B, Aschauer G, Schmitt C, Vallet S, Boros S, Pichler P, Hammerl-Steiner A, Renneberg F, Majjiga D, Russ G, Egle A, Leisch M, Melchardt T, Zaborsky N, Faber V, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A, Hasenauer J, Greil R. Validation of Recent Response Criteria (ELN-22, IWG-23 and PB-CR) in 1634 MDS/CMML/AML Patients Treated with HMA or HMA-Ven Using CPH Models and a CPH Deep Neural Network - Can or Should Response Criteria be Harmonized for Similarly Treated Patients? Blood 2024, 144: 7511-7511. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-208073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComposite complete remissionTime to next treatmentCox proportional hazardsHypomethylating agentsOverall survivalCox proportional hazards modelsMedian OSResponse CriteriaTreated ptsCycles of HMAHigher-risk MDSKaplan-Meier methodBone marrow evaluationProspective cohort studyStandard of careComplete remissionMarrow evaluationTreated patientsMultivariable adjustmentNext treatmentCohort studyClinical trialsClinical overlapHazard ratioDisease entity