2021
Assessments of risk of bias in systematic reviews of observational nutritional epidemiologic studies are often not appropriate or comprehensive: a methodological study
Zeraatkar D, Kohut A, Bhasin A, Morassut R, Churchill I, Gupta A, Lawson D, Miroshnychenko A, Sirotich E, Aryal K, Azab M, Beyene J, de Souza R. Assessments of risk of bias in systematic reviews of observational nutritional epidemiologic studies are often not appropriate or comprehensive: a methodological study. BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health 2021, 4: e000248. PMID: 35028518, PMCID: PMC8718856, DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000248.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2020
Airmen and health-care providers’ attitudes toward the use of genomic sequencing in the US Air Force: findings from the MilSeq Project
Pereira S, Hsu R, Islam R, Robinson J, Ramapriyan R, Sirotich E, Maxwell M, Majumder M, Blout C, Christensen K, Mehlman M, Parasidis E, Gardner C, Killian J, De Castro M, Green R, McGuire A. Airmen and health-care providers’ attitudes toward the use of genomic sequencing in the US Air Force: findings from the MilSeq Project. Genetics In Medicine 2020, 22: 2003-2010. PMID: 32807975, PMCID: PMC7710566, DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0928-9.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Longitudinal studies that use data collected as part of usual care risk reporting biased results: a systematic review
Farzanfar D, Abumuamar A, Kim J, Sirotich E, Wang Y, Pullenayegum E. Longitudinal studies that use data collected as part of usual care risk reporting biased results: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2017, 17: 133. PMID: 28877680, PMCID: PMC5588621, DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0418-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUsual careVisit timeSystematic reviewLongitudinal studyCare risksPart of patientsOutcomes of interestTotal followEmbase databasesNumber of visitsEligible articlesLack of needLack of awarenessPatientsImportant predictorVisitsLack of useCareLower proportionRiskPredictorsReviewMEDLINEFollowStudy