2024
A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort
Group M, Vasavada K, Vasavada V, Moran J, Devana S, Lee C, Hame S, Jazrawi L, Sherman O, Huston L, Haas A, Allen C, Cooper D, DeBerardino T, Spindler K, Stuart M, Amendola A, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, David T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hannafin J, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Levy B, Benjamin C, Maiers G, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens B, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Svoboda S, Taft T, Tenuta J, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Wright R, York J. A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2024, 12: 23259671241291920. PMID: 39555321, PMCID: PMC11565622, DOI: 10.1177/23259671241291920.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMulticenter ACL Revision StudyGraft failureRisk of graft failureAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionLogistic regressionFollow-up dataCruciate ligament reconstructionACL reconstruction failureLevel of evidencePatient-reported outcomesCohort dataIntraoperative findingsTibial tunnel sizesModerate predictive abilityReconstruction failureFollow-upGraft typeAllograft useCohort studyPreoperative radiographsLigament reconstructionRisk factorsCohortPatients
2013
Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions
Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Feeley BT, Albright J, Amendola A, Anderson A, Andrish J, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Bechler J, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Campbell J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper D, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, Dahm D, David T, DeBerardino T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hame S, Hannafin J, Harner C, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Hosea T, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Lantz B, Levy B, Ma C, Maiers G, Mann B, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens M, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Sherman O, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Spindler K, Stuart M, Svoboda L, Taft T, Tenuta C, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, York J. Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2013, 41: 1571-1578. PMID: 23698386, PMCID: PMC3839418, DOI: 10.1177/0363546513487980.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMarx activity levelACL reconstructionChondral injuriesRecurrent injuryPatellofemoral compartmentCommon causeActivity levelsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionACL graft injuryCruciate ligament reconstructionPrimary outcome variableCase-control studyGradual-onset injuriesLevel of evidenceFirst-time revisionsGraft injuryAssociated injuriesSurgical characteristicsIntraoperative findingsLigament reconstructionPrimary revisionGraft selectionGraft typeMeniscal injurySudden onset