Mentalizing, epistemic trust and interpersonal problems in emotion regulation: A sequential path analysis across common mental health disorders and community control samples
Kumpasoğlu G, Saunders R, Campbell C, Nolte T, Montague R, Pilling S, Leibowitz J, Fonagy P. Mentalizing, epistemic trust and interpersonal problems in emotion regulation: A sequential path analysis across common mental health disorders and community control samples. Journal Of Affective Disorders 2024, 372: 502-511. PMID: 39694336, DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.050.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInterpersonal problemsEmotion regulationEmotion dysregulationSequential mediation analysisMental health disordersEpistemic trustMediation analysisCross-sectional design prevents causal inferencesAssociated with emotion dysregulationMultiple mental health disordersHealth disordersCommunity control sampleEffective emotion regulationNon-clinical populationsModerated mediation analysisSample recruitment methodPsychological functioningSocial-communicative aspectsGroup differencesEmotionsMentalPath analysisStudy limitationsSequential path analysisDisordersTrust under development: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) for adolescents
Milesi A, Liotti M, Locati F, De Carli P, Speranza A, Campbell C, Fonagy P, Lingiardi V, Parolin L. Trust under development: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) for adolescents. PLOS ONE 2024, 19: e0307229. PMID: 39186540, PMCID: PMC11346731, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307229.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSelf-report instrumentEpistemic trustContext of personality disordersConcept of epistemic trustDevelopment of mental disordersPersonality disorderEmotion dysregulationMeasure mentalizingMental disordersPsychological functioningItalian validationMental healthPsychopathologyAdolescent populationInterpersonal trustAdolescentsDisordersResearch contextEmpirical validationHigh schoolItalian adult populationAdult populationMentalQuestionnaireValidityEnhancing emotion regulation with an in situ socially assistive robot among LGBTQ+ youth with self-harm ideation: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Williams A, Cleare S, Borschmann R, Tench C, Gross J, Hollis C, Chapman-Nisar A, Naeche N, Townsend E, Slovak P, Youth O, Creswell C, Fonagy P, Arseneault L, Lloyd E, De Alcantara Mendes J, Holter C, Jirotka M, Lazar Z, Patalay P, Kelly Y, Kandola A, Sonuga-Barke E, Livingstone S, Kostryka-Allchorne K, Bourgaize J, Stoilova M, O’Connor R, Auer D, Lee S, Jawahar N, Etherson M, Greenhalgh C, Sayal K, Warren J, Wanniarachchi V, Glover K, Stallard P, Hall C, Lucassen M, Merry S, Stasiak K, Babbage C, Khan K, Parker A, Lockwood J, Gregory J, Nielsen E, Vallejos E, Woodcock R, Doherty S, Willingham L. Enhancing emotion regulation with an in situ socially assistive robot among LGBTQ+ youth with self-harm ideation: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024, 14: e079801. PMID: 38195171, PMCID: PMC10806609, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079801.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSelf-harm ideationSelf-harmEmotion dysregulationEmotion regulationRandomised controlled trialsWaitlist controlEnhance emotion regulationExperiences of self-harmSocially assistive robotsSelf-Harm QuestionnaireSelf-harm thoughtsControlled trialsPeer-reviewed open access journalsLGBTQ+ youthPeople’s own viewsAssistive robotsControl participantsIntervention participantsAcceptable interventionSemistructured interviewsLinear mixed modelsPreliminary evidenceEthical approvalKing's College LondonSecondary outcomes