2021
Sex Differences in Procedural Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Darden D, Duong T, Du C, Munir MB, Han FT, Reeves R, Saw J, Zeitler EP, Al-Khatib SM, Russo AM, Minges KE, Curtis JP, Freeman JV, Hsu JC. Sex Differences in Procedural Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JAMA Cardiology 2021, 6: 1275-1284. PMID: 34379072, PMCID: PMC8358791, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3021.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHospital adverse eventsMajor adverse eventsAdverse eventsAtrial appendage occlusionMajor bleedingPericardial effusionAppendage occlusionAtrial fibrillationSex differencesCongestive heart failureCoronary artery diseaseAdjusted logistic regression analysisParoxysmal atrial fibrillationLogistic regression analysisMultivariable adjusted logistic regression analysesPrior strokeUncontrolled hypertensionHospital outcomesHospital stayMultivariable adjustmentProlonged hospitalBaseline characteristicsCohort studySelect patientsArtery disease
2020
Switching warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry
Sciria CT, Maddox TM, Marzec L, Rodwin B, Virani SS, Annapureddy A, Freeman JV, O'Hare A, Liu Y, Song Y, Doros G, Zheng Y, Lee JJ, Daggubati R, Vadlamani L, Cannon C, Desai NR. Switching warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry. Clinical Cardiology 2020, 43: 743-751. PMID: 32378265, PMCID: PMC7368350, DOI: 10.1002/clc.23376.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDirect oral anticoagulantsAF patientsAtrial fibrillationOral anticoagulantsAvailability of DOACsChronic warfarin therapyMultivariable hierarchical regressionNCDR PINNACLE RegistryPattern of anticoagulationProspective cohort studyPractice-level factorsPractice-level variationPINNACLE RegistryPrescribed warfarinSwitched patientsClinical characteristicsCohort studyStroke riskWarfarin therapyCurrent guidelinesPatientsWarfarinAnticoagulationPrivate insuranceSignificant predictors
2018
Stroke Risk and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Low CHA2DS2‐VASc Scores: Findings From the ORBIT‐AF I and II Registries
Jackson L, Kim S, Fonarow GC, Freeman JV, Gersh BJ, Go AS, Hylek EM, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Singer D, Thomas L, Blanco R, Peterson ED, Piccini J, Patients and Investigators T. Stroke Risk and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Low CHA2DS2‐VASc Scores: Findings From the ORBIT‐AF I and II Registries. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2018, 7: e008764. PMID: 30369317, PMCID: PMC6201408, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.118.008764.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOral anticoagulationAtrial fibrillationTreatment strategiesCardiology/American Heart Association guidelinesStroke/transient ischemic attackLow CHA2DS2-VASc scoreAmerican Heart Association guidelinesCHA2DS2-VASc scoreThromboembolic event rateTransient ischemic attackHeart Association guidelinesCurrent American CollegePatterns of treatmentIschemic attackVASc scoreCause mortalityStroke riskTreatment patternsAbsolute riskAssociation guidelinesStroke rateVAScAmerican CollegeLower riskPatients
2013
Effectiveness and Safety of Digoxin Among Contemporary Adults With Incident Systolic Heart Failure
Freeman JV, Yang J, Sung SH, Hlatky MA, Go AS. Effectiveness and Safety of Digoxin Among Contemporary Adults With Incident Systolic Heart Failure. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2013, 6: 525-533. PMID: 24021697, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.111.000079.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaCardiotonic AgentsChi-Square DistributionDigoxinDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHeart Failure, SystolicHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPractice Guidelines as TopicProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSex FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsIncident systolic heart failureSystolic heart failureSafety of digoxinΒ-blocker useDigoxin useHeart failureHF hospitalizationConcurrent β-blocker useSymptomatic systolic heart failureKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaHF disease severityOptimal medical therapyRisk of deathMedical therapyMultivariable analysisContemporary cohortCox regressionClinical guidelinesMedical historyHigh riskHospitalizationHigh mortalityPatientsDisease severityTrial data
2012
Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
Freeman JV, Masoudi FA. Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure. Heart Failure Clinics 2012, 9: 59-77. PMID: 23168318, DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAge FactorsAgedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyComparative Effectiveness ResearchDefibrillators, ImplantableDisease ManagementFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedObservationOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsSurvival RateConceptsCardiac resynchronization therapyTrial dataResynchronization therapyQRS morphologyNYHA class IV patientsCardiac devicesBenefit of ICDSingle-chamber ICDClass IV patientsHigh-volume hospitalsOptimal medical managementEffective treatment modalityPrior ventricular arrhythmiasProlonged QRS complexRecent trial dataRecent trial resultsImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorQuality of lifeHF hospitalizationSymptomatic HFHF symptomsICD therapySevere comorbiditiesIV patientsMortality benefit